Suspected sepsis: summary of NICE guidance

Affiliations

¹ National Guideline Centre, Royal College of Physicians, London NW1 4LE, UK.
² NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK s.faust@soton.ac.uk.

Andreas Freitag et al. BMJ. 2016.

. 2016 Aug 11:354:i4030.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4030.

¹ National Guideline Centre, Royal College of Physicians, London NW1 4LE, UK.
² NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK s.faust@soton.ac.uk.

Erratum in

Suspected sepsis: summary of NICE guidance.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] BMJ. 2017 Aug 23;358:j3993. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3993. BMJ. 2017. PMID: 28835416 No abstract available.

No abstract available

Authors' reply to Eisenhut.
Faust S, O'Flynn N, Keir C, Allaby M. Faust S, et al. BMJ. 2016 Nov 2;355:i5787. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5787. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27806960 No abstract available.
Sepsis quality standards are laudable but have low specificity.
Moran E, Munang M, Chan C, Chaudhri S, Himayakanthan M, Laird S, Moltu A, Naworynsky N, Pollard C, Saeed T, Scott P, Sussman M, Thein S, Trafford G, Balaji A, Jenkins N. Moran E, et al. BMJ. 2017 Apr 25;357:j1974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1974. BMJ. 2017. PMID: 28442486 No abstract available.