Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;74(6):736-749.
doi: 10.1177/1077558716662565. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Favorable Risk Selection in Medicare Advantage: Trends in Mortality and Plan Exits Among Nursing Home Beneficiaries

Affiliations

Favorable Risk Selection in Medicare Advantage: Trends in Mortality and Plan Exits Among Nursing Home Beneficiaries

Elizabeth M Goldberg et al. Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

The 2003 Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) increased payments to Medicare Advantage plans and instituted a new risk-adjustment payment model to reduce plans' incentives to enroll healthier Medicare beneficiaries and avoid those with higher costs. Whether the MMA reduced risk selection remains debatable. This study uses mortality differences, nursing home utilization, and switch rates to assess whether the MMA successfully decreased risk selection from 2000 to 2012. We found no decrease in the mortality difference or adjusted difference in nursing home use between plan beneficiaries pre- and post the MMA. Among beneficiaries with nursing home use, disenrollment from Medicare Advantage plans declined from 20% to 12%, but it remained 6 times higher than the switch rate from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage. These findings suggest that the MMA was not associated with reductions in favorable risk selection, as measured by mortality, nursing home use, and switch rates.

Keywords: Medicare; Medicare Advantage; Medicare Modernization Act; mortality; nursing home care; risk selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Total Medicare spending on fee-for-service beneficiaries in 2010 Note. This figure is based on a 20% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries who were enrolled in a traditional fee-for-service plan for the entirety of 2010. It includes both part A and part B spending.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in adjusted mortality rates in traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage, 2000-2012.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted difference between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage enrollees in the proportion that died by the end of an enrollment year. Note. Differences are estimated adjusting for age, sex, race, and county fixed effects.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Share of traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with a nursing home stay.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted difference in nursing home use rates between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries before and after the Medicare Modernization Act. Note. Differences are estimated adjusting for age, sex, race, and county fixed effects.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Share of traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries who switched by the following year (switch rate).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Adjusted difference in switch rates between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Note. Differences are estimated adjusting for age, sex, race, and county fixed effects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown J, Duggan M, Kuziemko I, Woolston W. How does risk selection respond to risk adjustment? New evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program. American Economic Review. 2014;104:3335–3364. - PubMed
    1. Cooper AL, Trivedi AN. Fitness memberships and favorable selection in Medicare Advantage plans. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366:150–157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curto J, Einav L, Leven J, Bhattacharya J. Can health insurance competition work? Evidence from Medicare Advantage. National Bureau of Economic Research; Cambridge, MA: 2014. (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series 20818).
    1. Grabowski DC, Stewart KA, Broderick SM, Coots LA. Predictors of nursing home hospitalization: A review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review. 2008;65:3–39. - PubMed
    1. Hellinger FJ, Wong HS. Selection bias in HMOs: A review of the evidence. Medical Care Research and Review. 2000;57:405–439. - PubMed

Publication types