Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 22:7:197.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00197. eCollection 2016.

Introduction and Utilization of High Priced HCV Medicines across Europe; Implications for the Future

Affiliations

Introduction and Utilization of High Priced HCV Medicines across Europe; Implications for the Future

Winnie de Bruijn et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Infection with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is a widespread transmittable disease with a diagnosed prevalence of 2.0%. Fortunately, it is now curable in most patients. Sales of medicines to treat HCV infection grew 2.7% per year between 2004 and 2011, enhanced by the launch of the protease inhibitors (PIs) boceprevir (BCV) and telaprevir (TVR) in addition to ribavirin and pegylated interferon (pegIFN). Costs will continue to rise with new treatments including sofosbuvir, which now include interferon free regimens.

Objective: Assess the uptake of BCV and TVR across Europe from a health authority perspective to offer future guidance on dealing with new high cost medicines.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study of medicines to treat HCV (pegIFN, ribavirin, BCV and TVR) among European countries from 2008 to 2013. Utilization measured in defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 patients/quarter (DIQs) and expenditure in Euros/DDD. Health authority activities to influence treatments categorized using the 4E methodology (Education, Engineering, Economics and Enforcement).

Results: Similar uptake of BCV and TVR among European countries and regions, ranging from 0.5 DIQ in Denmark, Netherlands and Slovenia to 1.5 DIQ in Tayside and Catalonia in 2013. However, different utilization of the new PIs vs. ribavirin indicates differences in dual vs. triple therapy, which is down to factors including physician preference and genotypes. Reimbursed prices for BCV and TVR were comparable across countries.

Conclusion: There was reasonable consistency in the utilization of BCV and TVR among European countries in comparison with other high priced medicines. This may reflect the social demand to limit the transmission of HCV. However, the situation is changing with new curative medicines for HCV genotype 1 (GT1) with potentially an appreciable budget impact. These concerns have resulted in different prices across countries, with their impact on budgets and patient outcomes monitored in the future to provide additional guidance.

Keywords: Hepatitis C; boceprevir; cross national drug utilization study; demand-side measures; introduction new medicines; sofosbuvir; telaprevir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Uptake BCV and TVR across European countries from the month first reimbursed. Each Bar represents a 3 month period. Only the first quarter of 2012 and 2013 is displayed in the legend to include all countries. (A) Included countries are: AU, Austria; BE, Belgium; DK, Denmark; EE, Estonia; ES (CT), Catalonia (Spain). (B) Included countries are: IT, Italy; NL, the Netherlands; UK-Scot (TS), Tayside (Scotland); SI, Slovenia; SE, Sweden; TR, Turkey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage utilization of TVR vs. ribavirin in quarters following reimbursement. NB: Upper range genotype 1 prevalence (=GT1) is 65% and highest percentages (50%) triple therapy containing TVR (mostly non-cirrhotic patients). Lower range GT1 prevalence is only 45% and lowest percentages (25%) triple therapy containing TVR (mostly cirrhotic patients).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage utilization of BCV vs. ribavirin in quarters following reimbursement. Upper range genotype 1 prevalence (=GT1) is 65% and highest percentages (92%) triple therapy containing BVC (mostly cirrhotic patients). Lower range GT1 prevalence is only 45% and lowest percentages (67%) triple therapy containing BVC (mostly naïve non-cirrhotic patients).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Expenditure on treatments for HCV (Euro/1000 inhabitants/quarter) from 2008 to 2013. NB: ◯ = reimbursement agreed BVC. Sweden and Denmark first quarter after EMA approval are included.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adamski J., Godman B., Ofierska-Sujkowska G., Osiñska B., Herholz H., Wendykowska K., et al. . (2010). Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10:153. 10.1186/1472-6963-10-153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrieux-Meyer I., Cohn J., de Araújo E. S. A., Hamid S. S. (2015). Disparity in market prices for hepatitis C virus direct-acting drugs. Lancet Glob. Heal. 3, e676–e677. 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00156-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atun R., Aydın S., Chakraborty S., Sümer S., Aran M., Gürol I., et al. . (2013). Universal health coverage in Turkey: enhancement of equity. Lancet 382, 65–99. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61051-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aygen B., Yıldız O., Akhan S., Çelen M. K., Ural O., Koruk S. T., et al. . (2015). Retreatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection with Telaprevir: preliminary results in Turkey. Balkan. Med. J. 32, 266–272. 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barua S., Greenwald R., Grebely J., Dore G. J., Swan T., Taylor L. E. (2015). Restrictions for medicaid reimbursement of sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States. Ann. Int. Med. 163, 215–223. 10.7326/M15-0406 - DOI - PubMed