Comparison of the Initial Loco-Regional Treatment Received for Early-Stage Breast Cancer between Elderly Women in Appalachia and a United States - Based Population: Good and Bad News
- PMID: 27517039
- PMCID: PMC4977024
- DOI: 10.20941/2309-4419.2016.04.2
Comparison of the Initial Loco-Regional Treatment Received for Early-Stage Breast Cancer between Elderly Women in Appalachia and a United States - Based Population: Good and Bad News
Abstract
Background: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (RT) (BCS+RT) is as effective for long-term survival of invasive early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) as mastectomy, and is the local treatment option selected by the majority of women with ESBC. Women of older age and vulnerable socio-demographic characteristics are at greater risk for receiving substandard (BCS only) and non-preferred treatments (mastectomy), such as populations of women from the Appalachian region of United States.
Methods: Using a retrospective cohort study design, we identified 26,106 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked dataset and 811 patients from the West Virginia Cancer Registry (WVCR)-Medicare dataset age ≥ 66 diagnosed from 2003 to 2006 with stage I-II breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated type of initial treatment received between WVCR-Medicare and SEER-Medicare patients, and the association with type of treatment.
Results: Overall, women in WV were 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.99) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.84) times less likely to have mastectomy or BCS only vs. BCS+RT, than those in SEER regions. Women in WV of increasing age, greater comorbidity, stage II disease, and non-white race were more likely to have mastectomy or BCS only vs. BCS+RT, whereas, those residing in areas of higher income, higher education, and metro status were less likely, than similarly characterized women from SEER regions.
Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that the magnitude of disparities in breast cancer treatment between groups of women with more and less resources are even greater in the Appalachian region, than they are among US populations. Improving access to oncology treatment services, as well as, the implementation of patient navigation programs are needed to improve patterns of initial treatment for ESBC among at-risk populations.
Similar articles
-
Disparities in the Initial Local Treatment of Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):735-744. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5639. Epub 2017 Feb 7. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017. PMID: 28170302 Free PMC article.
-
Associated Factors and Survival Outcomes for Breast Conserving Surgery versus Mastectomy among New Zealand Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;18(5):2738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052738. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33800387 Free PMC article.
-
Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer: an HMO and fee-for-service comparison.JAMA. 1999 Feb 24;281(8):720-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.8.720. JAMA. 1999. PMID: 10052442
-
Investigating confounders of the association between survival and adjuvant radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery in a sample of elderly breast Cancer patients in Appalachia.BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6263-3. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31847855 Free PMC article.
-
Severity of comorbid conditions and early-stage breast cancer therapy: linked SEER-Medicare data from 1993 to 2005.Cancer Med. 2013 Aug;2(4):526-36. doi: 10.1002/cam4.66. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Cancer Med. 2013. PMID: 24156025 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, Margolese R, Wolmark N, Wickerham L, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(13):822–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198903303201302. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese R, Deutsch M, Fisher E, et al. Twenty-year follow-up trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomize study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020989. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman I, Rutgers E, Christiaens M, Limbergen E, et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I–II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):412–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70042-6. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Simone N, Dan T, Shih J, Smith S, Sciuto L, Lita E, et al. Twenty-five year results of the national cancer institute randomized breast conservation trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(1):197–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1867-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials