Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;4(3):248-52.

Effects of Hip Geometry on Fracture Patterns of Proximal Femur

Affiliations

Effects of Hip Geometry on Fracture Patterns of Proximal Femur

Seyyed Morteza Kazemi et al. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Some studies have previously shown that geometry of proximal femur can affect the probability of fracture and type of fracture. It happens since the geometry of the proximal femur determines how a force is applied to its different parts. In this study, we have compared proximal femur's geometric characteristics in femoral neck (FNF), intertrochanteric (ITF) and Subtrochanteric (STF) fractures.

Methods: In this study, 60 patients who had hip fractures were studied as case studies. They were divided into FNF, ITF and STF groups based on their fracture types (20 patients in each group). Patients were studied with x-ray radiography and CT scans. Radiological parameters including femoral neck length from lateral cortex to center of femoral head (FNL), diameter of femoral head (FHD), diameter of femoral neck (FND), femoral head neck offset (FHNO), neck-shaft angle (alpha), femoral neck anteversion (beta) were measured and compared in all three groups.

Results: Amount of FNL was significantly higher in STF group compared to FNF (0.011) while ITF and STF as well as FNT and ITF did not show a significant different. Also, FND in FNF group was significantly lower than the other two groups, i.e. ITF and STF. In other cases there were no instances of significant statistical difference.

Conclusion: Hip geometry can be used to identify individuals who are at the risk of fracture with special pattern. Also, it is important to have more studies in different populations and more in men.

Keywords: Femur; Fracture; Geometry; Hip.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The method of measurement of radiographic parameters. femoral neck length: Length between lateral cortex in proximal femur (B) and center of femoral head along femoral neck axis (A); Femoral head diameter: Femoral head diameter drawn from center of femoral head (Line C-D); Femoral neck diameter: Longest femoral neck diameter (Line E-F); Femoral head neck offset: the ratio of femoral head to femoral neck; Neck-shaft angle (α): the angle between femoral shaft axis and femoral neck axis.

References

    1. Karlsson KM, Sernbo I, Obrant KJ, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O. Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture. Bone. 1996;18(4):327–30. - PubMed
    1. Chappard C, Bousson V, Bergot C, Mitton D, Marchadier A, Moser T, et al. Prediction of femoral fracture load: cross-sectional study of texture analysis and geometric measurements on plain radiographs versus bone mineral density. Radiology. 2010;255(2):536–43. - PubMed
    1. Pulkkinen P, Jamsa T, Lochmuller EM, Kuhn V, Nieminen MT, Eckstein F. Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(4):547–58. - PubMed
    1. Thevenot J, Pulkkinen P, Kuhn V, Eckstein F, Jamsa T. Structural asymmetry between the hips and its relation to experimental fracture type. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;87(3):203–10. - PubMed
    1. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Fini M, Giardino R, Giavaresi G. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(1):69–73. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources