Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug:16 Suppl:S105-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.02.031.

Prognosis of Primary Myelofibrosis in the Genomic Era

Affiliations
Review

Prognosis of Primary Myelofibrosis in the Genomic Era

Prithviraj Bose et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Currently, prognostication in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) relies on the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS), and DIPSS-plus, which incorporate age, blood counts, constitutional symptoms, circulating blasts, red cell transfusion need, and karyotype. Although the JAK2 V617F mutation was discovered a decade ago and MPL mutations shortly thereafter, it was the recent discovery of CALR mutations in the vast majority of JAK2/MPL-unmutated patients and recognition of the powerful impact of CALR mutations and triple-negative (JAK2/MPL/CALR-negative) status on outcome that set the stage for revision of traditional prognostic models to include molecular information. Additionally, the advent of next-generation sequencing has identified a host of previously unrecognized somatic mutations across hematologic malignancies. As in the myelodysplastic syndromes, the majority of common and prognostically informative mutations in PMF affect epigenetic regulation and mRNA splicing. Thus, a need has arisen to incorporate mutational information on genes such as ASXL1 and SRSF2 into risk stratification systems. Mutations in yet other genes appear to be important players in leukemic transformation, and new insights into disease pathogenesis are emerging. Finally, the number of prognostically detrimental mutations may affect both survival and response to ruxolitinib, which has significant implications for clinical decision making. In this review, we briefly summarize the prognostic models in use today and discuss in detail the somatic mutations commonly encountered in patients with PMF, along with their prognostic implications and role in leukemic transformation. Emerging prognostic models that incorporate new molecular information into existing systems or exclude clinical variables are also presented.

Keywords: Leukemic transformation; Mutations; Primary myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dameshek W. Some speculations on the myeloproliferative syndromes. Blood. 1951;6:372–5. - PubMed
    1. Tefferi A. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1255–65. - PubMed
    1. Hultcrantz M, Kristinsson SY, Andersson TM, Landgren O, Eloranta S, Derolf AR, Dickman PW, Bjorkholm M. Patterns of survival among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2008: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2995–3001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Passamonti F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Reilly JT, Demory JL, Rumi E, Guglielmelli P, Roncoroni E, Tefferi A, Pereira A. Improving survival trends in primary myelofibrosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2981–7. - PubMed
    1. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger M, Miller C, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH, Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner E, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Vaddi K, Erickson-Viitanen S, Koumenis IL, Sun W, Sandor V, Kantarjian HM. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:799–807. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms