Safety, efficacy and outcome-related factors of perampanel over 12 months in a real-world setting: The FYDATA study
- PMID: 27521586
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.08.001
Safety, efficacy and outcome-related factors of perampanel over 12 months in a real-world setting: The FYDATA study
Erratum in
-
Erratum to "Safety, efficacy and outcome-related factors of perampanel over 12months in a real-world setting: The FYDATA study" [Epilepsy Res. 126 (2016) 201-210].Epilepsy Res. 2017 Jan;129:174-175. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 22. Epilepsy Res. 2017. PMID: 28017504 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Real-world data of current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to treat focal seizures is of importance to understand the efficacy and safety outside of the clinical trial setting. Here we report real-world data from a large series of patients treated with perampanel for 1year.
Methods: FYDATA was a multicentre, retrospective, 1-year observational study assessing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant perampanel in patients ≥12 years of age with focal epilepsy in a real-world setting. At 12 months, the proportion of patients who were seizure free, median percentage seizure reduction, proportion of responders, retention rate and proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Analyses were also performed to identify any patient-, medication- and disease-related factors associated with a large clinical response or carry a risk for AEs.
Results: A total of 464 patients were included in the study with a retention rate of 60.6% at 1year. The mean number of prior AEDs was 7.8. The median percentage reduction in overall seizures was 33.3% (75% for secondary generalised seizures) after 1year, with 7.2% of patients achieving seizure freedom. Furthermore, patients on non-enzyme-inducing AEDs were more likely to achieve seizure freedom, and logistic regression revealed that patients aged ≥65 years, those with epilepsy due to a vascular aetiology and those who had received fewer prior AEDs showed a better clinical response to perampanel. A total of 62.9% of the patients experienced AEs at 12 months; dizziness, somnolence and irritability were the most frequent AEs. Patients with prior psychiatric comorbidities (hyperactivity and personality disorder) were more likely to experience psychiatric AEs with perampanel, and slower titration schedules were associated with less AEs overall.
Conclusion: Perampanel, for the treatment of focal epilepsy in a real-world setting in a refractory population, over 1year, demonstrates a similar efficacy and safety profile to that observed in clinical trials. Our results have implications for the optimisation of perampanel use in a clinical setting.
Keywords: Antiepileptic drug; Epilepsy; Perampanel; Real-world.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Concentration-effect relationships with perampanel in patients with pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures.Epilepsia. 2013 Aug;54(8):1490-7. doi: 10.1111/epi.12240. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Epilepsia. 2013. PMID: 23772853 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: results of randomized global phase III study 305.Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):117-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03638.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20. Epilepsia. 2013. PMID: 22905857 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term safety of perampanel and seizure outcomes in refractory partial-onset seizures and secondarily generalized seizures: results from phase III extension study 307.Epilepsia. 2014 Jul;55(7):1058-68. doi: 10.1111/epi.12643. Epub 2014 May 27. Epilepsia. 2014. PMID: 24867391 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The adverse event profile of perampanel: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Neurol. 2013 Aug;20(8):1204-11. doi: 10.1111/ene.12170. Epub 2013 Apr 23. Eur J Neurol. 2013. PMID: 23607817 Review.
-
Perampanel for focal epilepsy: insights from early clinical experience.Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Mar;133(3):160-72. doi: 10.1111/ane.12529. Epub 2015 Oct 28. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016. PMID: 26506904 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness and safety of mono- and add-on perampanel in pediatric patients with epilepsy: Experience from a single-center retrospective study.Epilepsia Open. 2024 Feb;9(1):268-277. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12865. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Epilepsia Open. 2024. PMID: 37943144 Free PMC article.
-
Perampanel as first add-on choice on the treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: an observational real-life study.Neurol Sci. 2021 Apr;42(4):1389-1394. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04636-7. Epub 2020 Aug 9. Neurol Sci. 2021. PMID: 32772278
-
Therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel: Clinical utility and impact of co-medication on pharmacokinetic variability.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 20;10(1):e23962. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23962. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38226257 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of perampanel in adults with mesial temporal epilepsy: A single-center postmarketing study in Taiwan.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(42):e17171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017171. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31626082 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Use of Perampanel in Elderly Asian Patients with Epilepsy: Expert Opinion.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Aug 16;18:825-832. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S371396. eCollection 2022. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022. PMID: 35996554 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources