Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):945-950.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw160.

Changes in the Lethality of Frailty Over 30 Years: Evidence From Two Cohorts of 70-Year-Olds in Gothenburg Sweden

Affiliations

Changes in the Lethality of Frailty Over 30 Years: Evidence From Two Cohorts of 70-Year-Olds in Gothenburg Sweden

Kristoffer Bäckman et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: With aging, health deficits accumulate: people with few deficits for their age are fit, and those with more are frail. Despite recent reports of improved health in old age, how deficit accumulation is changing is not clear. Our objectives were to evaluate changes over 30 years in the degree of deficit accumulation and in the relationship between frailty and mortality in older adults.

Methods: We analyzed data from two population based, prospective longitudinal cohorts, assembled in 1971-1972 and 2000-2001, respectively. Residents of Gothenburg Sweden, systematically drawn from the Swedish population registry. The 1901-1902 cohort (N = 973) had a response rate of 84.8%; the 1930 cohort (N = 500) had a response rate of 65.1%. A frailty index using 36 deficits was calculated using data from physical examinations, assessments of physical activity, daily, sensory and social function, and laboratory tests. We evaluated mortality over 12.5 years in relation to the frailty index.

Results: Mean frailty levels were the same (x¯ = 0.20, p = .37) in the 1901-1902 cohort as in the 1930 cohort. Although the frailty index was linked to the risk of death in both cohorts, the hazards ratio decreased from 1.67 per 0.1 increment in the frailty index for the first cohort to 1.32 for the second cohort (interaction term p = .005).

Discussion: Although frailty was as common at age 70 as before, its lethality appears to be less. Just why this is so should be explored further.

Keywords: Cohort effects; Deficit accumulation; Frail older adults; Frailty index; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Survival curves based on the level of frailty.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Bar graph of the hazards ratios.

References

    1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, et al. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374 (9696):1196–1208. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manton KG, Gu X, Lamb VL. Change in chronic disability from 1982 to 2004/2005 as measured by long-term changes in function and health in the U.S. elderly population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18374–18379. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608483103 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manton KG. Recent declines in chronic disability in the elderly U.S. population: risk factors and future dynamics. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:91–113. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090812 - PubMed
    1. Shamliyan T, Talley KM, Ramakrishnan R, et al. Association of frailty with survival: a systematic literature review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(2):719–736. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2012.03.001 - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A, Song X, et al. Long term risks of death and institutionalization of elderly people in relation to deficit accumulation at age 70. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):975–979. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00738.x - PubMed