Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 15;11(1):90.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0424-8.

Development of a Chinese version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

Affiliations

Development of a Chinese version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

W W Tong et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with meniscal pathology. Our study aims to culturally adapt and validate the WOMET into a Chinese version.

Methods: We translated the WOMET into Chinese. Then, a total of 121 patients with meniscal pathology were invited to participate in this study. To assess the test-retest reliability, the Chinese version WOMET was completed twice at 7-day intervals by the participants. The construct validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient or Spearman's correlation to test for correlations among the Chinese version WOMET and the eight domains of Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Responsiveness was tested by comparison of the preoperative and postoperative scores of the Chinese version WOMET.

Results: The test-retest reliability of the overall scale and different domains were all found to be excellent. The Cronbach's α was 0.90. The Chinese version WOMET correlated well with other questionnaires which suggested good construct validity. We observed no ceiling and floor effects of the Chinese version WOMET. We also found good responsiveness for the effect size, and the standardized response mean values were 0.86 and 1.11.

Conclusions: The Chinese version of the WOMET appears to be reliable and valid in evaluating patients with meniscal pathology.

Keywords: Cross-cultural adaptation; Meniscal pathology; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland-Altman plots of test-retest reliability of the Chinese version WOMET. The plots are for the a physical, b sports et al.: sports/reaction/work/lifestyle, c emotions, and d overall score of the Chinese version WOMET. Each point indicates the difference in score of Chinese version WOMET for each patient between the two assessments (test and retest). The dashed line shows the 95 % (1.96 SD) limits of agreement

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laible C, Stein DA, Kiridly DN. Meniscal repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(4):204–13. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-04-204. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majewski M, Susanna H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee. 2006;13:184–8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frizziero A, Ferrari R, Giannotti E, Ferroni C, Poli P, Masiero S. The meniscus tear: state of the art of rehabilitation protocols related to surgical procedures. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;2(4):295–301. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaquero J, Forriol F. Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6(1):71–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sgaglione NA, Steadman JR, Shaffer B, Miller MD, Fu FH. Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:S161–88. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.032. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types