Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review
- PMID: 27524918
- PMCID: PMC4965221
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S97759
Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review
Abstract
Inadequate cancer pain relief has been documented extensively across historical records. In response, in 1986, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines for cancer pain treatment. The purpose of this paper is to disseminate the results of a comprehensive, integrative review of studies that evaluate the effectiveness of the WHO guidelines. Studies were included if they: 1) identified patients treated with the guidelines, 2) evaluated self-reported pain, 3) identified instruments used, 4) provided data documenting pain relief, and 5) were written in English. Studies were coded for duration of treatment, definition of pain relief, instruments used, findings related to pain intensity or relief, and whether measures were used other than the WHO analgesic ladder. Twenty-five studies published since 1987 met the inclusion criteria. Evidence indicates 20%-100% of patients with cancer pain can be provided pain relief with the use of the WHO guidelines - while considering their status of treatment or end-of-life care. Due to multiple limitations in included studies, analysis was limited to descriptions. Future research to examine the effectiveness of the WHO guidelines needs to consider recommendations to facilitate study comparisons by standardizing outcome measures. Recent studies have reported that patients with cancer experience pain at moderate or greater levels. The WHO guidelines reflect the knowledge and effectual methods to relieve most cancer pain, but the guidelines are not being adequately employed. Part of the explanation for the lack of adoption of the WHO guidelines is that they may be considered outdated by many because they are not specific to the pharmacological and interventional options used in contemporary pain management practices. The conundrum of updating the WHO guidelines is to encompass the latest pharmacological and interventional innovations while maintaining its original simplicity.
Keywords: World Health Organization; cancer; guidelines; pain; review.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 27819973
-
[Use of the World Health Organization guidelines on cancer pain relief before referral to a specialized pain service].Schmerz. 2005 Aug;19(4):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00482-004-0338-y. Schmerz. 2005. PMID: 15164275 German.
-
Interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain: evidence-based practice guidelines.Pain Physician. 2005 Jan;8(1):1-47. Pain Physician. 2005. PMID: 16850041
-
Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians' (ASIPP) Guidelines.Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S5-S62. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18443640 Review.
-
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23. Pain Pract. 2008. PMID: 18503626
Cited by
-
Feasibility and potential effects of breathing exercise for chronic pain management in breast cancer survivors: study protocol of a phase II randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e064358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064358. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36517097 Free PMC article.
-
Current management of cancer pain in Italy: Expert opinion paper.Open Med (Wars). 2021 Dec 6;17(1):34-45. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0393. eCollection 2022. Open Med (Wars). 2021. PMID: 34950771 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oxycodone versus morphine for cancer pain titration: A systematic review and pharmacoeconomic evaluation.PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231763. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32302346 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitization of Cutaneous Primary Afferents in Bone Cancer Revealed by In Vivo Calcium Imaging.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 24;12(12):3491. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123491. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33255209 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the challenges and roles of nurses in delivering palliative care for cancer patients and co-morbidities in Ghana.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 28;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01211-7. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37635254 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer . World Cancer Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press; 2014.
-
- Kurita GP, Tange UB, Farholt H, et al. Pain characteristics and management of inpatients admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre: a cross-sectional study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(4):518–525. - PubMed
-
- Marks RM, Sachar EJ. Undertreatment of medical inpatients with narcotic analgesics. Ann Intern Med. 1973;78(2):173–181. - PubMed
-
- Foley KM. Pain syndromes in patients with cancer. In: Foley KM, Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V, editors. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1979. pp. 59–75.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous