Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul 22:9:515-34.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S97759. eCollection 2016.

Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review

Cathy L Carlson. J Pain Res. .

Abstract

Inadequate cancer pain relief has been documented extensively across historical records. In response, in 1986, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines for cancer pain treatment. The purpose of this paper is to disseminate the results of a comprehensive, integrative review of studies that evaluate the effectiveness of the WHO guidelines. Studies were included if they: 1) identified patients treated with the guidelines, 2) evaluated self-reported pain, 3) identified instruments used, 4) provided data documenting pain relief, and 5) were written in English. Studies were coded for duration of treatment, definition of pain relief, instruments used, findings related to pain intensity or relief, and whether measures were used other than the WHO analgesic ladder. Twenty-five studies published since 1987 met the inclusion criteria. Evidence indicates 20%-100% of patients with cancer pain can be provided pain relief with the use of the WHO guidelines - while considering their status of treatment or end-of-life care. Due to multiple limitations in included studies, analysis was limited to descriptions. Future research to examine the effectiveness of the WHO guidelines needs to consider recommendations to facilitate study comparisons by standardizing outcome measures. Recent studies have reported that patients with cancer experience pain at moderate or greater levels. The WHO guidelines reflect the knowledge and effectual methods to relieve most cancer pain, but the guidelines are not being adequately employed. Part of the explanation for the lack of adoption of the WHO guidelines is that they may be considered outdated by many because they are not specific to the pharmacological and interventional options used in contemporary pain management practices. The conundrum of updating the WHO guidelines is to encompass the latest pharmacological and interventional innovations while maintaining its original simplicity.

Keywords: World Health Organization; cancer; guidelines; pain; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
WHO analgesic ladder. Abbreviation: WHO, World Health Organization.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . World Cancer Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press; 2014.
    1. Isaac T, Stuver SO, Davis RB, et al. Incidence of severe pain in newly diagnosed ambulatory patients with stage IV cancer. Pain Res Manag. 2012;17(5):347–352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurita GP, Tange UB, Farholt H, et al. Pain characteristics and management of inpatients admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre: a cross-sectional study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(4):518–525. - PubMed
    1. Marks RM, Sachar EJ. Undertreatment of medical inpatients with narcotic analgesics. Ann Intern Med. 1973;78(2):173–181. - PubMed
    1. Foley KM. Pain syndromes in patients with cancer. In: Foley KM, Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V, editors. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1979. pp. 59–75.

LinkOut - more resources