ICU Readmissions: Good for Reflection on Performance But Not a Reflection of Quality
- PMID: 27526001
- PMCID: PMC4988323
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001809
ICU Readmissions: Good for Reflection on Performance But Not a Reflection of Quality
Comment on
-
Incidence and Etiology of Potentially Preventable ICU Readmissions.Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):1704-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001746. Crit Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27071066
References
-
- Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000-2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Critical care medicine. 2010;38(1):65–71. - PubMed
-
- Rhodes A, Moreno RP, Azoulay E, et al. Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Intensive care medicine. 2012;38(4):598–605. - PubMed
-
- Berenholtz SM, Dorman T, Ngo K, et al. Qualitative review of intensive care unit quality indicators. Journal of critical care. 2002;17(1):1–12. - PubMed
-
- Elliott M, Worrall-Carter L, Page K. Intensive care readmission: a contemporary review of the literature. Intensive & critical care nursing : the official journal of the British Association of Critical Care Nurses. 2014;30(3):121–137. - PubMed
-
- Kramer AA, Higgins TL, Zimmerman JE. The association between ICU readmission rate and patient outcomes. Critical care medicine. 2013;41(1):24–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
