Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla
- PMID: 27528103
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.192
Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla
Abstract
Purpose: The injection of a local anesthetic before tooth extraction is always associated with pain, and palatal anesthesia is the most painful type of injection for the patient. The specific aims of the study were to evaluate "pain control" using 4% articaine without palatal injection and to compare adequate anesthesia and pain control in the anterior and posterior regions of the maxilla.
Materials and methods: This prospective controlled study followed a split-mouth protocol, in which patients served as their own control. Forty-eight patients who needed routine extraction of permanent maxillary anterior and posterior teeth were referred. After an injection of 4% articaine and a 5-minute wait, 1 posterior tooth and 1 anterior tooth were extracted using standard techniques. The patient's perception of pain was assessed using a visual analog scale and a verbal rating scale after each injection and extraction. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, paired-sample t test, and independent-samples t test to determine whether differences were statistically significant (P < .05).
Results: In total, 48 anterior and 48 posterior teeth were extracted from 48 patients. Extraction of maxillary teeth was possible without an additional palatal injection for 87 teeth (90.6%), whereas only 9 teeth (9.4%) needed an additional palatal injection to complete the extraction. Of the total number of patients, 90% reported that the pain caused by tooth extraction in the anterior and posterior regions of the maxilla was mild. None of the patients rated the pain of extraction in the maxilla as severe.
Conclusion: There was no difference in pain perception when extracting anterior and posterior teeth. Of the total number of teeth, 90.6% were extracted without the need for palatal injection. In this study, extraction of erupted maxillary teeth using 4% articaine without manipulation of the palatal mucosa obviated palatal infiltration during extraction. Articaine anesthesia provides adequate palatal anesthesia for maxillary teeth extraction in the anterior and posterior regions without the need for a palatal block.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;76(4):737-743. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Nov 27. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29257943 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Mar;107(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Nov 8. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009. PMID: 18996033 Clinical Trial.
-
Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 20. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006. PMID: 17138173 Clinical Trial.
-
Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth without palatal injection: a meta-analysis.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Oct;126(4):e187-e195. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Feb 7. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29753696 Review.
-
Can Single Buccal Infiltration With 4% Articaine Induce Sufficient Analgesia for the Extraction of Maxillary Teeth? A Systematic Literature Review.Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42975. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37671226 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Painless palatal local anesthetic injection: A low-cost, effective technique.Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):151-152. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_220_17. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 29416482 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Can single buccal infiltration with 4% articaine induce sufficient analgesia for the extraction of primary molars in children: a systematic literature review.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):179-186. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.179. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32934983 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):203-212. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32934986 Free PMC article.
-
The Clinical Efficacy of EMLA as a Topical Anesthetic Agent Instead of Palatal Injection During Maxillary Dental Extractions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Mar;22(1):172-177. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01633-x. Epub 2021 Aug 22. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023. PMID: 36703663 Free PMC article.
-
Anesthetic efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 adrenaline and 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 adrenaline as a single buccal injection in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic purposes.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):233-240. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.233. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32934989 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources