Creation and Validation of a Novel Mobile Simulation Laboratory for High Fidelity, Prehospital, Difficult Airway Simulation
- PMID: 27530816
- DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X16000534
Creation and Validation of a Novel Mobile Simulation Laboratory for High Fidelity, Prehospital, Difficult Airway Simulation
Abstract
Introduction Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a complex clinical skill complicated by the inherent challenge of providing care in the prehospital setting. Literature reports a low success rate of prehospital ETI attempts, partly due to the care environment and partly to the lack of consistent standardized training opportunities of prehospital providers in ETI. Hypothesis/Problem The availability of a mobile simulation laboratory (MSL) to study clinically critical interventions is needed in the prehospital setting to enhance instruction and maintain proficiency. This report is on the development and validation of a prehospital airway simulator and MSL that mimics in situ care provided in an ambulance.
Methods: The MSL was a Type 3 ambulance with four cameras allowing audio-video recordings of observable behaviors. The prehospital airway simulator is a modified airway mannequin with increased static tongue pressure and a rigid cervical collar. Airway experts validated the model in a static setting through ETI at varying tongue pressures with a goal of a Grade 3 Cormack-Lehane (CL) laryngeal view. Following completion of this development, the MSL was launched with the prehospital airway simulator to distant communities utilizing a single facilitator/driver. Paramedics were recruited to perform ETI in the MSL, and the detailed airway management observations were stored for further analysis.
Results: Nineteen airway experts performed 57 ETI attempts at varying tongue pressures demonstrating increased CL views at higher tongue pressures. Tongue pressure of 60 mm Hg generated 31% Grade 3/4 CL view and was chosen for the prehospital trials. The MSL was launched and tested by 18 paramedics. First pass success was 33% with another 33% failing to intubate within three attempts.
Conclusions: The MSL created was configured to deliver, record, and assess intubator behaviors with a difficult airway simulation. The MSL created a reproducible, high fidelity, mobile learning environment for assessment of simulated ETI performance by prehospital providers. Bischof JJ , Panchal AR , Finnegan GI , Terndrup TE . Creation and validation of a novel mobile simulation laboratory for high fidelity, prehospital, difficult airway simulation. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(5):465-470.
Keywords: CL Cormack-Lehane; EMS; EMS Emergency Medical Services; ETI endotracheal intubation; ETT endotracheal tube; MSL mobile simulation laboratory; airway management; endotracheal intubation; prehospital; simulation.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Paramedic Performance on Difficult Airway Simulation.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 May-Jun;24(3):411-420. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1102993. Epub 2016 Nov 21. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020. PMID: 27870588
-
Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):30-3. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.519821. Epub 2010 Nov 10. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011. PMID: 21067319 Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of prehospital endotracheal intubation performed by emergency physicians: retrospective survey of a single emergency medical center in Japan.J Anesth. 2013 Jun;27(3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1528-x. Epub 2012 Dec 14. J Anesth. 2013. PMID: 23238811
-
[Emergency anesthesia, airway management and ventilation in major trauma. Background and key messages of the interdisciplinary S3 guidelines for major trauma patients].Anaesthesist. 2011 Nov;60(11):1027-40. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1957-1. Anaesthesist. 2011. PMID: 22089890 Review. German.
-
Prehospital Cricothyrotomy: A Narrative Review of Technical, Educational, and Operational Considerations for Procedure Optimization.J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;70:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.018. Epub 2024 Sep 3. J Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 39915151 Review.
Cited by
-
The comparison of endotracheal intubation and laryngeal tube insertion with face-to-face method in in-vehicle traffic accidents.Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03885-8. Online ahead of print. Intern Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 39961934
-
A Randomized Comparison of In-hospital Rescuer Positions for Endotracheal Intubation in a Difficult Airway.West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):660-667. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.4.37227. Epub 2018 May 15. West J Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30013701 Free PMC article.
-
Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 19;12(7):e059442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36219737 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Mobile Telesimulation Unit to Train Rural and Remote Practitioners on High-Acuity Low-Occurrence Procedures: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14587. doi: 10.2196/14587. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31389340 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials