Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e011559.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011559.

Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists

J Nowak  1 , C Erbe  2 , I Hauck  1 , D A Groneberg  1 , I Hermanns  3 , R Ellegast  3 , D Ditchen  3 , D Ohlendorf  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists

J Nowak et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a kinematic comparison of occupational posture in orthodontists and dentists in their workplace.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Dentist surgeries and departments of orthodontics at university medical centres in Germany.

Participants: A representative sample of 21 (10 female, 11 male) dentists (group G1) and 21 (13 female, 8 male) orthodontists (G2) with one male dropout in G2.

Outcome measures: The CUELA (computer-assisted acquisition and long-term analysis of musculoskeletal loads) system was used to analyse occupational posture. Parallel to the recording through the CUELA system, a software-supported analysis of the activities performed (I: treatment; II: office; III: other activities) was carried out. In line with ergonomic standards the measured body angles are categorised into neutral, moderate and awkward postures. Activities between the aforementioned groups are compared using the stratified van Elteren U test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test. All p values are subject to the Bonferroni-Holm correction. The level of significance is set at 5%.

Results: The percentage of time spent on activities in categories I-II-III was as follows: dentists 41%-23%-36% and orthodontists 28%-37%-35%. The posture analysis of both groups showed, for all percentiles (P5-95), angle values primarily in the neutral or moderate range. However, depending on the activity performed, between 5% and 25% of working hours were spent in unfavourable postures, especially in the head-and-neck area. Orthodontists have a greater tendency than dentists to perform treatment activities with the head and torso in unfavourable positions. The statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to the duration and the relevance of the activities performed confirm this assumption for all three categories (p<0.01, p<0.05).

Conclusions: Generally, both groups perform treatment activities in postures that are in the neutral or medium range; however, dentists had slightly more unfavourable postures during treatment for a greater share of their work day.

Keywords: CUELA; Kinematic posture analysis; dentist; orthodontist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the CUELA (computer-assisted acquisition and long-term analysis of musculoskeletal loads) system. Patient consent received.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of temporal duration of activities performed by both professional groups. D, dentist; O, orthodontist.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: a review. Ind Health 2007;45:611–21. 10.2486/indhealth.45.611 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Princen K et al. . Potential occupational health problems for dentists in Flanders, Belgium. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:8–16. 10.1007/s00784-005-0003-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Ruijter RA, Stegenga B, Schaub RM et al. . Determinants of physical and mental health complaints in dentists: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2015;43:86–96. 10.1111/cdoe.12122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burke FJ, Main JR, Freeman R. The practice of dentistry: an assessment of reasons for premature retirement. Br Dent J 1997;182:250–4. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809361 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mehta A, Gupta M, Upadhyaya N. Status of occupational hazards and their prevention among dental professionals in Chandigarh, India: a comprehensive questionnaire survey. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10:446–51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types