Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0159738.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159738. eCollection 2016.

Role of New Nature Reserve in Assisting Endangered Species Conservation - Case Study of Giant Pandas in the Northern Qionglai Mountains, China

Affiliations

Role of New Nature Reserve in Assisting Endangered Species Conservation - Case Study of Giant Pandas in the Northern Qionglai Mountains, China

Tian-Pei Guan et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The creation of nature reserves is the most direct way to save endangered species populations and their habitat. Development of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) nature reserve network in China was initiated in the 1960s, though the effort to create new reserves boomed considerably after the year 2000. Given this rapid development of protected areas in panda habitats, and the potential conflicting interests between conservation administrations and local economic development, it is essential to assess the role of new nature reserves in the overall giant panda conservation effort and reserve network. We utilized data from national giant panda surveys conducted in 2000 and 2012 to compare the size, spatial use, and distribution of panda populations, as well as the habitat suitability and connectivity in the Northern Qionglai Mountains between the two survey years. Our results show that although the total giant panda population in the study area did not change remarkably, local changes did occur. Most notably, the population in Wolong Nature Reserve declined by 27.3% (N = 39) and the population in Caopo Nature Reserve increased by 71.4% (N = 29) over the 12-year study period. We also found habitat suitability and availability decreased in both Wolong (12.4%) and Caopo (7.4%), but that the relative density of giant pandas declined (19.2%) and increased (84.6%) at each site, respectively. The distance between centers of high IUA were more distant in 2012 (14.1±1.9km) than that in 2000 (6.1±0.9km; t = -7.4, df = 5, p = 0.001), showing a scattered spatial pattern. Habitat availability decreased by 42% within the corridor between the two reserves, however panda occurrences in the corridor increased 24.6%. Compared to the total number of encounters, the proportion of the corridor increased 45.76%. Our results show the importance and success of the newly established Caopo to the conservation of giant pandas, and how crucial it is to identify and repair reserve corridors. Furthermore, we propose criteria for future nature reserve network management and investment, which is applicable for other endangered species conservation practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Giant panda habitat suitability, population distribution and range in the Northern Qionglai Mountains in 2012, Southwest of China.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Giant panda available habitat distribution in 2000 and 2012 within Northern Qionglai Mountains, China.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Spatial pattern analysis of medium intense utilization area (IUA) in 2000 (a) and 2012 (b).
The center of medium IUA in 2000 was randomly distribute in 2000, but this pattern changed into dispersed in 2012.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Spatial utilization pattern of the giant panda population in Northern Qionglai Mountains in 2000 and 2012 respectively, Southwest of China.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gaston KJ, Jackson SF, Cantú-Salazar L, Cruz-Piñón G. The ecological performance of protected areas. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 2008; 93–113.
    1. Brooks TM, Wright SJ, Sheil D. Evaluating the success of conservation actions in safeguarding tropical forest biodiversity. Conserv Biol. 2009; 23(6):1448–1457. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01334.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boitani L, Cowling RM, Dublin HT, Mace GM, Parrish J, Possingham HP, et al. Change the IUCN protected area categories to reflect biodiversity outcomes. PLoS Biol. 2008; 6(3):e66 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060066 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Western D, Russell S, Cuthill I. The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS One. 2009; 4(7):e6140 10.1371/journal.pone.0006140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgess ND, Loucks C, Stolton S, Dudley N. The potential of forest reserves for augmenting the protected area network in Africa. Oryx, 2007;41(2):151–159.

LinkOut - more resources