Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 27534916
- DOI: 10.1111/jre.12402
Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate histomorphometric variables, the amount of new bone (NB), residual graft (RG) particles and soft tissue (ST), related to various grafting materials and assess the effect of graft healing time on different histomorphometric outcomes. Studies that were published before October 2015 were electronically and manually searched in three databases. We included human studies that reported the amount of NB, RG and ST in the biopsies taken from the grafted sinuses. Based on the applied grafting materials, extracted data were categorized into different groups. Furthermore, extracted data were classified into three groups based on healing time: (i) ≤ 4.5 mo; (ii) 4.5-9 mo; and (iii) ≥ 9-13.5 mo. The search provided 791 titles. Full text analysis was performed for 258 articles resulting in 136 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Autogenous bone (AB) resulted in the highest amount of NB and lowest amount of RG compared to other grafting materials. Based on this meta-analysis, a significant difference was noticed in the amount of NB formation in grafts with a healing time of > 4.5 mo when compared to the grafts with less healing time. However, when comparing biopsies taken at 4.5-9 mo of healing (average = 6.22 mo) to the ones taken at ≥ 9-13.5 mo (average = 10.36 mo), no significant difference was noticed in the amount of NB formation of various grafts except allografts that resulted in a significantly higher percentage of NB at 9.5 mo of healing. Based on histomorphometric analysis, AB results in the highest amount of NB formation in comparison to the other grafting materials. Bone substitute materials (allografts, alloplastic materials and xenografts) seem to be good alternatives to autogenous bone and can be considered as grafting materials to avoid disadvantages related to AB, including morbidity rate, limited availability and high volumetric change. Combining AB with alloplastic materials and xenografts brings no significant advantages regarding NB formation.
Keywords: biomaterials; bone regeneration; guided bone regeneration; histomorphometry; maxillary sinus floor augmentation; sinus floor augmentation.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1106-22. doi: 10.1111/clr.12702. Epub 2015 Oct 10. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016. PMID: 26452326
-
Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 31230768
-
Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):371-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Mar 4. J Prosthet Dent. 2015. PMID: 25749077
-
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328. Ann Periodontol. 2003. PMID: 14971260
-
Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:49-70. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007. PMID: 18437791
Cited by
-
Influence of different incision designs on bone increment of guided bone regeneration (Bio-Gide collagen membrane +Bio-OSS bone powder) during the same period of maxillary anterior tooth implantation.Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):2155-2163. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1932209. Bioengineered. 2021. PMID: 34057023 Free PMC article.
-
Study of Two Bovine Bone Blocks (Sintered and Non-Sintered) Used for Bone Grafts: Physico-Chemical Characterization and In Vitro Bioactivity and Cellular Analysis.Materials (Basel). 2019 Feb 1;12(3):452. doi: 10.3390/ma12030452. Materials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30717171 Free PMC article.
-
The vertical course of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus floor augmentations: A histomorphometric analysis of human biopsies.J Periodontol. 2021 Feb;92(2):263-272. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0656. Epub 2020 Aug 19. J Periodontol. 2021. PMID: 32715479 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcome of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach: A 10-year follow-up study.J Dent Sci. 2020 Sep;15(3):270-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Jun 3. J Dent Sci. 2020. PMID: 32952884 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Osseous Defects after Mandibular Third Molar Removal with a Resorbable Alloplastic Grafting Material: A Case Series with 1- to 2-Year Follow-Up.Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 21;13(20):4688. doi: 10.3390/ma13204688. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33096766 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous