Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;24(2):226-44.
doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.24.2.226.

The Student Human Papillomavirus Survey: Nurse-Led Instrument Development and Psychometric Testing to Increase Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Series Completion in Young Adults

Affiliations

The Student Human Papillomavirus Survey: Nurse-Led Instrument Development and Psychometric Testing to Increase Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Series Completion in Young Adults

Tami Thomas et al. J Nurs Meas. 2016.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Student Human Papillomavirus Survey (SHPVS) was developed to examine students' perceived benefits or barriers to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.

Methods: Survey development included (a) 2-phase integrative literature reviews; (b) draft of survey items based on the literature; (c) critique of survey items by young adults, nursing and psychology faculty, and health care providers; and (d) pilot testing. The psychometric properties of the SHPVS were evaluated using classical item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) among a sample of 527 university students' ages 18-24 years.

Results: The estimated Cronbach's alpha for the SHPVS is .74.

Conclusions: The SHPVS is a measure of young adults HPV perceived vulnerability, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and perceived benefits of HPV vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural Equation Model of 15 Items Allowing Correlations Between 3 Constructs SMCs (squared multiple correlations) shown upper right corner of each SHPV item Factor Loadings (standardized regression weights) shown above each path (single arrow) Correlations between constructs shown next to two-way double-headed arrows RMSEA=0.058 [90% CI 0.049, 0.067]; PCLOSE=0.064 CMIN/DF=2.769; NRI=0.7960; CFI=0.850

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88:588–606.
    1. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107:238–246. - PubMed
    1. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Sage; Newbury Park, CA: 1993. pp. 136–162.
    1. Carmines EG, McIver JP. Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In: Bohrnstedt GW, Borgatta EF, editors. Social measurement: Current issues. Sage; Beverly Hills: 1981. p. 80.
    1. CDC National and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13 through 17 years--United States, 2010. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011;60(33):1117–1123. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances