Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Oct;142(10):2209-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2211-7. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

MassARRAY, pyrosequencing, and PNA clamping for EGFR mutation detection in lung cancer tissue and cytological samples: a multicenter study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

MassARRAY, pyrosequencing, and PNA clamping for EGFR mutation detection in lung cancer tissue and cytological samples: a multicenter study

Kyueng-Whan Min et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is an important process in the therapeutic plan of patients with lung cancer. Recently, MassARRAY, based on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, has been shown to be a useful method for somatic mutation analysis with pyrosequencing and peptide nucleic acid clamping (PNAc).

Methods: A total of 107 tissues and 67 cytological samples, which were confirmed to have lung adenocarcinoma at nine hospitals in Korea, were collected. Among the MassARRAY, pyrosequencing, and PNAc, the concordance rates and sensitivity of EGFR mutation detection were analyzed and validated in comparative tissue and cytological specimens.

Results: The concordance rate between pyrosequencing and PNAc was higher than that between MassARRAY and either of the pyrosequencing and PNAc in both tissue and cytological samples. In a comparison of diagnostic performance, MassARRAY (sensitivity: 85.7 %) was higher than pyrosequencing (74.3 %) and PNAc (70 %) in tissue, although pyrosequencing (80.5 %) was more highly sensitive, compared to MassARRAY (70.7 %) and PNAc (70.7 %) in terms of cytology. Unexpectedly, use of MassARRAY resulted in a significantly different EGFR mutation detection rate between tissue and cytological samples.

Conclusions: When used for the detection of EGFR mutations, MassARRAY was more sensitive than pyrosequencing or PNA clamping in tissue, but not in cytological samples. In EGFR mutation detection between tissues and cytology, PNAc showed relatively higher concordance than MassARRAY or pyrosequencing.

Keywords: EGFR mutation; Lung adenocarcinoma; Mass spectrometry, pyrosequencing; Peptide nucleic acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no actual or potential conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative microphotographs showing hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide from tissue sample (a) and Papanicolaou slide from conventional cytological sample (b) (original magnification ×100)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Venn diagram showing the distribution of EGFR mutation detection using MassARRAY, pyrosequencing, and PNA clamping methods in the tissue and cytology
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Progression-free survival with respect to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status as determined by MassARRAY, pyrosequencing, and PNA clamping

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmadian A, Ehn M, Hober S (2006) Pyrosequencing: history, biochemistry and future. Clin Chim Acta 363:83–94 - PubMed
    1. Azzoli CG et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Zhongguo fei ai za zhi 13:171–189 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basu P, Chandna P, Bamezai RN, Siddiqi M, Saranath D, Lear A, Ratnam S (2011) MassARRAY spectrometry is more sensitive than PreTect HPV-Proofer and consensus PCR for type-specific detection of high-risk oncogenic human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical cancer. J Clin Microbiol 49:3537–3544 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buttitta F et al (2013) Effective assessment of egfr mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and pleural fluids by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 19:691–698 - PubMed
    1. da Cunha Santos G, Saieg MA, Geddie W, Leighl N (2011) EGFR gene status in cytological samples of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: controversies and opportunities. Cancer Cytopathol 119:80–91. doi:10.1002/cncy.20150 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources