Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;52(3):320-341.
doi: 10.1177/0021886316648774. Epub 2016 May 14.

The Critical Roles of Task Conflict and Job Autonomy in the Relationship Between Proactive Personalities and Innovative Employee Behavior

Ellen Giebels  1 , Renee S M de Reuver  2 , Sonja Rispens  3 , Elze G Ufkes  1
Affiliations

The Critical Roles of Task Conflict and Job Autonomy in the Relationship Between Proactive Personalities and Innovative Employee Behavior

Ellen Giebels et al. J Appl Behav Sci. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

We examine why and when proactive personality is beneficial for innovative behavior at work. Based on a survey among 166 employees working in 35 departments of a large municipality in the Netherlands we show that an increase in task conflicts explains the positive relation between a proactive personality and innovative employee behavior. This process is moderated by job autonomy in such a way that the relationship between proactive personality and task conflict is particularly strong under low compared with high autonomy. The present research contributes to the discussion on the potential benefits of task conflict for change processes and highlights the importance of examining the interplay between personality and work context for understanding innovation practices.

Keywords: conflict; innovation; proactivity; task autonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The proposed research model. Note. Solid lines represent main effects; dotted lines represent moderation effects. H = Hypothesis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The association between proactive personality and task conflict as a function of job autonomy: curves for two different levels of the moderator (−1 SD [low] and +1 SD [high] autonomy).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aiken L. A., West S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    1. Amason A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management groups. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148. doi:10.2307/256633 - DOI
    1. Anderson N., DeDreu C. K. W., Nijstad B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173. doi:10.1002/job.236 - DOI
    1. Armenakis A. A., Bedeian A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293-315. doi:10.1177/014920639902500303 - DOI
    1. Armenakis A. A., Harris S. G., Mossholder K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46, 681-703. doi:10.1177/001872679304600601 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources