Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 1:11:3607-19.
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S109600. eCollection 2016.

Bolaamphiphile-based nanocomplex delivery of phosphorothioate gapmer antisense oligonucleotides as a treatment for Clostridium difficile

Affiliations

Bolaamphiphile-based nanocomplex delivery of phosphorothioate gapmer antisense oligonucleotides as a treatment for Clostridium difficile

John P Hegarty et al. Int J Nanomedicine. .

Abstract

Despite being a conceptually appealing alternative to conventional antibiotics, a major challenge toward the successful implementation of antisense treatments for bacterial infections is the development of efficient oligonucleotide delivery systems. Cationic vesicles (bolasomes) composed of dequalinium chloride ("DQAsomes") have been used to deliver plasmid DNA across the cardiolipin-rich inner membrane of mitochondria. As cardiolipin is also a component of many bacterial membranes, we investigated the application of cationic bolasomes to bacteria as an oligonucleotide delivery system. Antisense sequences designed in silico to target the expression of essential genes of the bacterial pathogen, Clostridium difficile, were synthesized as 2'-O-methyl phosphorothioate gapmer antisense oligonucleotides (ASO). These antisense gapmers were quantitatively assessed for their ability to block mRNA translation using luciferase reporter and C. difficile protein expression plasmid constructs in a coupled transcription-translation system. Cationic bolaamphiphile compounds (dequalinium derivatives) of varying alkyl chain length were synthesized and bolasomes were prepared via probe sonication of an aqueous suspension. Bolasomes were characterized by particle size distribution, zeta potential, and binding capacities for anionic oligonucleotide. Bolasomes and antisense gapmers were combined to form antisense nanocomplexes. Anaerobic C. difficile log phase cultures were treated with serial doses of gapmer nanocomplexes or equivalent amounts of empty bolasomes for 24 hours. Antisense gapmers for four gene targets achieved nanomolar minimum inhibitory concentrations for C. difficile, with the lowest values observed for oligonucleotides targeting polymerase genes rpoB and dnaE. No inhibition of bacterial growth was observed from treatments at matched dosages of scrambled gapmer nanocomplexes or plain, oligonucleotide-free bolasomes compared to untreated control cultures. We describe the novel application of cationic bolasomes to deliver ASOs into bacteria. We also report the first successful in vitro antisense treatment to inhibit the growth of C. difficile.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; antisense; bacteria; cationic bolaamphiphiles; dequalinium derivatives; gapmers; nanocomplex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cationic bolaamphiphile chemical structures. Notes: (A) Dequalinium: 1,1′-decane-1,10-diylbis(4-amino-2-methylquinolinium) decyl-2-methyl-4-quinolin-1-iumamine dichloride. C30H40Cl2N4 MW =527.58. (B) 10-cyclohexyl-DQA: 10-10′-(decane-1,10-diyl)bis(9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridinium) dichloride. C36H48N4CL2 MW =607.71. (C) 12-cyclohexyl-DQA: 10-10′-(dodecane-1,12-diyl) bis(9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridinium) dichloride. C38H52N4CL2 MW =635.76.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypothetical cationic bolaamphiphile nanovesicle structure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative antisense sequence targeting open loop local secondary structures within the 5′UTR of an mRNA transcript (eg, C. difficile rpoB). Note: Antisense gapmer is depicted in red. Abbreviation: 5′-UTR, 5-untranslated region.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Luciferase reporter and protein expression plasmids. Notes: (A) Representative 5′UTR-modified luciferase reporter plasmid (eg, dnaE); (B) Full-length dnaE expression plasmid. Abbreviation: 5′-UTR, 5-untranslated region.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Antisense gapmer luciferase reporter assays. Notes: Inhibition of luciferase translation expressed as relative luciferase units in cell-free reactions programmed with matched 5′UTR-modified luciferase reporter plasmid by antisense gapmers (0–5 µM; shown as log10 nM) targeting C. difficile 5′UTR sequences and a scrambled gapmer control. Standard error of the mean for each set of samples is indicated. Abbreviation: 5′-UTR, 5-untranslated region.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Immunoblot densitometry of triplicate antisense and scrambled gapmer (0–1 µM) on cell-free translation of C. difficile dnaE protein. Notes: Protein (dnaE) levels are expressed as percent of untreated controls. Standard error of the mean for each set of samples is indicated.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Image of compound synthesis. Note: Tricyclic aromatic amine 1 was heated together with alkyl dichloride 2, linking the two acridine moieties with an alkyl chain.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(A) Oligreen dye-exclusion assays to determine bolasome binding capacity using 2 µg gapmer ASO. (B) Bolasome complexation and retention of phosphorothioate antisense gapmers following metaphor electrophoresis and SYBR Green II staining. Lanes 1–4: Amine-to-phosphate (N/P) ratio =0, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0. Abbreviation: ASO, antisense oligonucleotides.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Dose effects of 12-cyclohexyl-DQA gapmer nanocomplexes (0–0.8 µM gapmer) and matching levels of gapmer-free 12-cyclohexyl-DQA bolasomes (1.2–9.6 µM) on the growth C. difficile ribotype 027 in 24-hour endpoint BHIS broth cultures (n=3). Notes: The data are expressed as average CFU/mL values normalized to the initial inoculum CFU. Error bars represent standard deviation observed for each group of experiments. Abbreviation: CFU, colony-forming units.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davies AH, Roberts AK, Shone CC, Acharya KR. Super toxins from a super bug: structure and function of Clostridium difficile toxins. Biochem J. 2011;436(3):517–526. - PubMed
    1. McFarland LV, Elmer GW, Surawicz CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(7):1769–1775. - PubMed
    1. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(8):693–702. - PubMed
    1. Steglich M, Nitsche A, Von Müller L, et al. Tracing the spread of Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 in Germany based on bacterial genome sequences. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139811. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilliland C, Weaver J, Stevenson M, et al. Association of Clostridium difficile ribotype 078 with detectable toxin in human stool specimens. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(11):1341–1345. - PubMed