Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty
- PMID: 27536618
- PMCID: PMC4972719
- DOI: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.146
Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Materials and methods: From June 2002 to May 2012, 40 patients who could be followed-up for more than 1 year after surgery were enrolled in this study. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.5 months (range, 15-97 months) and the average age at the time of surgery was 71.5 years (range, 38-89 years). The fracture types were determined by using the Vancouver classification. Among intraoperative fractures, there were type A in 3 hips, type B2 in 2 hips and type B3 in one. Among postoperative fractures, type AG was present in 5 hips, type AL in 2 hips, type B1 in 15 hips, type B2 in 6 hips, type B3 in 3 hips, and type C in 3 hips. Evaluation of the results was based on bony union, stability of the prosthesis, postoperative complications, and Harris hip score at the final follow-up.
Results: Bony union was achieved in all but one case and the average time for bony union was 21 weeks. The mean Harris hip score was 86 at the final follow-up. Clinical results were above good in 34 of 40 hips (85.0%). Stem loosening occurred in one patient with a type B1 fracture treated with open reduction and plate fixation. Nonunion was observed in 1 patient with an AG type fracture.
Conclusion: Open reduction and fixation using a plate with a screw and cerclage wiring provided good results for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a stable femoral stem without bone defects. Revision surgery with a cementless long stem should be considered in patients with an unstable stem or suspected stability in B1 type of THA using a proximal fixation type.
Keywords: Cementless hip arthroplasty; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Surgical treatment.
Figures


Similar articles
-
[Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(1):52-58. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017. PMID: 28253947 Czech.
-
Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018812241. doi: 10.1177/2309499018812241. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018. PMID: 30449250
-
Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Arthroplasty Vancouver Type B.Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Sep;56(3):536-543. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.21. Acta Clin Croat. 2017. PMID: 29479920
-
Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 19. Injury. 2015. PMID: 25085599 Review.
-
Causes of failure in periprosthetic fractures of the hip at 1- to 14-year follow-up.Injury. 2014 Dec;45 Suppl 6:S85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Nov 14. Injury. 2014. PMID: 25457325 Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of the Inner-Side-Out Use of the LC-DCP for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jul 30;54(6):879-884. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00200-9. eCollection 2020 Nov. Indian J Orthop. 2020. PMID: 33133411 Free PMC article.
-
Osteosynthesis of bilateral Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture after a bilateral RM® total hip arthroplasty at 24 and 21-years follow-up: A case report.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;60:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 11. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019. PMID: 31212096 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using a Cable-plate.Hip Pelvis. 2019 Sep;31(3):166-173. doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.3.166. Epub 2019 Aug 29. Hip Pelvis. 2019. PMID: 31501766 Free PMC article.
-
Differences between two sequential uncemented stem sizes in total hip arthroplasty: A comparative biomechanical study and potential clinical implications.SICOT J. 2022;8:43. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2022043. Epub 2022 Nov 11. SICOT J. 2022. PMID: 36367405 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of traumatic Vancouver type AG periprosthetic fractures treated nonoperatively.J Orthop. 2024 Dec 27;66:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.12.035. eCollection 2025 Aug. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39896856
References
-
- Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury. 2007;38:651–654. - PubMed
-
- Campbell P, Mcwilliams TG. Periprosthetic femoral fractures. Curr Orthop. 2002;16:126–132.
-
- Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:243–249. - PubMed
-
- Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:857–865. - PubMed
-
- Berend ME, Smith A, Meding JB, Ritter MA, Lynch T, Davis K. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 Suppl 2):53–59. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources