Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;66(4):278-85.

Demodex musculi Infestation in Genetically Immunomodulated Mice

Affiliations

Demodex musculi Infestation in Genetically Immunomodulated Mice

Peter C Smith et al. Comp Med. 2016.

Abstract

Demodex musculi, a prostigmatid mite that has been reported infrequently in laboratory mice, has been identified with increasing frequency in contemporary colonies of immunodeficient mice. Here we describe 2 episodes of D. musculi infestation with associated clinical signs in various genetically engineered mouse strains, as well as treatment strategies and an investigation into transmissibility and host susceptibility. The first case involved D. musculi associated with clinical signs and pathologic lesions in BALB/c-Tg(DO11.10)Il13(tm) mice, which have a defect in type 2 helper T cell (Th2) immunity. Subsequent investigation revealed mite transmission to both parental strains (BALB/c-Tg[DO11.10] and BALB/c-Il13(tm)), BALB/c-Il13/Il4(tm), and wild-type BALB/c. All Tg(DO11.10)Il13(tm) mice remained infested throughout the investigation, and D. musculi were recovered from all strains when they were cohoused with BALB/c-Tg(DO11.10)Il13(tm) index mice. However, only Il13(tm) and Il13/Il4(tm) mice demonstrated persistent infestation after index mice were removed. Only BALB/c-Tg(DO11.10)Il13(tm) showed clinical signs, suggesting that the phenotypic dysfunction of Th2 immunity is sufficient for persistent infestation, whereas clinical disease associated with D. musculi appears to be genotype-specific. This pattern was further exemplified in the second case, which involved NOD.Cg-Prkdc(scid)Il2r(tm1Wjl)/SzJ (NSG) and C;129S4 Rag2(tm1.1Flv) Il2rg(tm1.1Flv)/J mice with varying degrees of blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and facial pruritis. Topical amitraz decreased mite burden but did not eliminate infestation or markedly ameliorate clinical signs. Furthermore, mite burden began to increase by 1 mo posttreatment, suggesting that topical amitraz is an ineffective treatment for D. musculi. These experiences illustrate the need for vigilance regarding opportunistic and uncommon pathogens in rodent colonies, especially among mice with immunologic deficits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Gross and histologic findings in BALB/c-Tg(DO11.10)IL13tm mice. (A and B). Gross lesions associated with Demodex musculi infestation in BALB/c-Tg(DO11.10)IL13tm mice. (A) Alopecia and excoriations in the dorsal cervical, intrascapular and periocular regions (arrows). (B) Facial alopecia and severe excoriation of the external ear canals and perioccular regions (arrows). (C) Hair plucks from affected mice. Hair plucks were taken from the head and dorsal cervical region of Tg(DO11.10)IL13tm mice, placed on a slide with mineral oil, and examined by light microscopy. The size and morphology of the mites identified in these samples are consistent with Demodex musculi (arrow). Bar, 20 μm. (D through F). Photomicrographs of skin sections from BALB/c-Tg(DO11.10)IL13tm mice infested with Demodex musculi. Sections of mites were present within dilated hair follicles (arrows, panels D and E; black asterisk, panel F) and sebaceous glands (arrow, panel F). Mite infestation was accompanied by epidermal hyperplasia with superficial erosions and cellular crusts (white asterisk, panel E). Superficial periadnexal inflammation was evident (white asterisk, panel F). Bar: 50 μm (D), 100 μm (E, F)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Gross and histologic findings in NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) and C;129S4-Rag2tm1.1Flv Il2rgtm1.1Flv/J mice. (A and B) Affected mice had variable degrees of (A) dorsal hypotrichosis, scaling, and erythema and (B) accompanied by blepharitis. (C) Fur plucks revealed an arthropod with the elongated abdominal morphology consistent with Demodex musculi . Mineral oil mount; Bar, 20 μm. (D) Histopathology of the dorsal interscapular region revealed mites within follicles. In many infested follicles, inflammation was minimal to absent. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; bar, 50 μm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mite burden at baseline, after the second bath, and at 2 and 4 wk after the final (that is, 4th) treatment with amitraz. Mite numbers declined in response to amitraz but started to return to pretreatment levels after discontinuation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akilov OE, Mumcuoglu KY. 2004. Immune response in demodicosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18:440–444. - PubMed
    1. Badescu AC, Iancu LS, Statescu L. 2013. Demodex: commensal or pathogen? Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 117:189–193. - PubMed
    1. Baker DG.2007. Arthropods, p 568–569. In: Fox J, Barthold SW, Davisson MT, Newcmer CE, Quimby FW, Smith AL. The mouse in biomedical research, 2nd ed: vol. 2 DiseasesNew York (NY):Elsevier.
    1. Baker DG. 2007. Parasites of rats and mice, p356–357 In: Flynn RJ, Baker DG, Flynn RJ. Flynn's parasites of laboratory animals, second ed Ames (IA): Blackwell Publishing.
    1. Beale K. 2012. Feline demodicosis: a consideration in the itchy or overgrooming cat. J Feline Med Surg 14:209–213. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources