Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw
- PMID: 2754110
- DOI: 10.1121/1.398223
Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw
Abstract
The task-dependent organization of sensorimotor mechanisms during the production of speech was investigated using a perturbation paradigm. Six subjects received unanticipated jaw perturbations before and during tongue elevation for [aedae], in which the lips do not participate, and bilabial closure for [aebae], in which the tongue does not participate. A strain gauge system was used to monitor inferior-superior displacements of the upper lip, lower lip, and jaw, while hooked-wire electrodes monitored muscle activity in various muscles of the lips, jaw, and tongue. Results indicated significant compensatory kinematic adjustments to jaw perturbations in the lips and/or jaw during [aebae], but no labial compensations during [aedae] (with the exception of one subject). EMG responses were inconsistent and not necessarily indicative of the kinematic findings. Individual subjects responded to perturbations reliably but differently, using different combinations of involved articulators to achieve bilabial closure and lingua-alveolar contact. The current study supports earlier research which suggests that the components of the motor system are flexibly assembled, based on the requirements of the specific task. That is, compensatory responses to sensory information occur only when such responses are functionally necessary.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes.J Neurophysiol. 1985 Aug;54(2):418-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.2.418. J Neurophysiol. 1985. PMID: 4031995
-
Sensorimotor characteristics of speech motor sequences.Exp Brain Res. 1989;75(3):586-98. doi: 10.1007/BF00249910. Exp Brain Res. 1989. PMID: 2744116
-
Movements of the upper and lower lips during speech: interactions between lips with the jaw fixed at different positions.J Speech Hear Res. 1986 Sep;29(3):348-56. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2903.356. J Speech Hear Res. 1986. PMID: 3762098
-
Upper lip, lower lip, and jaw interactions during speech: comments on evidence from repetition-to-repetition variability.J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Dec;82(6):1919-24. doi: 10.1121/1.395687. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987. PMID: 3323281 Review.
-
Brainstem circuits that control mastication: do they have anything to say during speech?J Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Aug 1. J Commun Disord. 2006. PMID: 16884732 Review.
Cited by
-
Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(2):219-29. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2673-4. Epub 2011 Apr 12. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21484393 Clinical Trial.
-
Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.J Neurolinguistics. 2012 Sep 1;25(5):382-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Mar 26. J Neurolinguistics. 2012. PMID: 22661828 Free PMC article.
-
Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Aug;116(2):1168-78. doi: 10.1121/1.1763952. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004. PMID: 15376682 Free PMC article.
-
Discrete constriction locations describe a comprehensive range of vocal tract shapes in the Maeda model.JASA Express Lett. 2021 Dec;1(12):124402. doi: 10.1121/10.0009058. Epub 2021 Dec 28. JASA Express Lett. 2021. PMID: 35005711 Free PMC article.
-
The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Aug 10;63(8):2637-2648. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00318. Epub 2020 Jul 22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020. PMID: 32697611 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources