Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 27544900
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the evidence base for the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines for severe aortic stenosis (SAS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction by comparing the natural history of the disease in subgroups of low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis patients with high-gradient (HG) patients.
Background: The 2014 AHA/ACC valvular disease guidelines recommend estimation of stroke volume index by echocardiography in patients with suspected LG SAS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for all studies that have compared the natural history of SAS with preserved ejection fraction in flow-gradient patterns. We studied the following 3 subgroups: HG, low-flow low-gradient (LFLG), and normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG). The random effects model was used to pool individual study results. The end-point was long-term all-cause mortality.
Results: A total of 9 studies with 3,065 patients fulfilled the criteria. Compared to HG SAS, both LFLG and NFLG patients had a higher burden of comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and hypertension. Atrial fibrillation was more prevalent in LFLG patients. Moreover, end-diastolic volume index was smaller for LFLG patients and indexed aortic valve area was larger for NFLG patients. All-cause mortality was similar between HG and LFLG subgroups (relative risk: 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.83 to 1.38; p = 0.60), whereas patients with NFLG had a significantly lower all-cause mortality compared to the HG subgroup (relative risk: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.86; p = 0.004).
Conclusions: Patients with LFLG SAS have similar outcomes compared to HG SAS but worse compared to NFLG SAS. These findings support estimating stroke volume index in patients with suspected LG SAS. All analyses revealed high heterogeneity and further high-quality studies are necessary.
Keywords: mortality; preserved ejection fraction; severe aortic stenosis; stroke volume index.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Aortic Stenosis Grading and Outcome: New Categories, New Therapeutic Challenges.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1264-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.034. Epub 2016 Aug 17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27544893 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb 24;18(4):471-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.044. Epub 2024 Dec 18. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 39708011
-
Myocardial Contraction Fraction for Risk Stratification in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012257. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012257. Epub 2021 Aug 17. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 34403263
-
Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1380-1389. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00442. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 39552481
-
Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Systolic Function: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05021-9. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28698585 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation on Echocardiography Parameters After TransCatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):367-376. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31555. Epub 2025 Apr 24. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40270122
Cited by
-
The robustness of the flow-gradient classification of severe aortic stenosis.JTCVS Open. 2023 Sep 20;16:177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.08.022. eCollection 2023 Dec. JTCVS Open. 2023. PMID: 38204672 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Do Patients Experience Better Quality of Life Regardless of Gradient?Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 Jan 1;50(1):e217659. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7659. Tex Heart Inst J. 2023. PMID: 36695735 Free PMC article.
-
Moderate gradient severe aortic stenosis: diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2021 Oct 8;23(Suppl E):E133-E137. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab108. eCollection 2021 Oct. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2021. PMID: 34650372 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure.Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):821-829. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9726-8. Heart Fail Rev. 2018. PMID: 30094532 Review.
-
Prognostic Relevance of Gradient and Flow Status in Severe Aortic Stenosis.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 14;13(20):6113. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206113. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39458063 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources