Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;127(5):1187-1194.
doi: 10.1002/lary.26234. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: A systematic review

Margaret Barnett  1 , Brian Hixon  2 , Neville Okwiri  3 , Catherine Irungu  3 , John Ayugi  3 , Robin Thompson  2 , Jennifer B Shinn  2 , Matthew L Bush  2
Affiliations

Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: A systematic review

Margaret Barnett et al. Laryngoscope. 2017 May.

Abstract

Objective/hypothesis: Hearing loss is a public health concern, yet hearing healthcare disparities exist and influence utilization of rehabilitation services. The objective of this review was to systematically analyze the published literature on motivators, barriers, and compliance factors affecting adult patient access and utilization of hearing rehabilitation healthcare.

Data sources: Pubmed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles. Eligible studies were those containing original, peer-reviewed research in English pertaining to factors affecting adult hearing healthcare access and utilization of hearing aids and cochlear implantation. The search encompassed 1990 to 2015.

Methods: Two investigators independently reviewed all articles and extracted data. Specific variables regarding access to care and compliance to recommended care were extracted from each study.

Results: Thirty articles were reviewed. The factors affecting access and utilization of hearing rehabilitation could be classified into motivators, barriers, and compliance in treatment or device use. The key motivators to seek care include degree of hearing loss, self-efficacy, family support, and self-recognition of hearing loss. The primary barriers to care were financial limitations, stigma of hearing devices, inconvenience, competing chronic health problems, and unrealistic expectations. Compliance is most affected by self-efficacy, education level, and engagement in the rehabilitation process.

Conclusion: Accessing hearing healthcare is complicated by multiple factors. Considering the current climate in healthcare policy and legislation toward improved access of care, a deeper understanding of motivators, barriers, and compliance factors can aid in delivery of effective and efficient hearing healthcare. Laryngoscope, 127:1187-1194, 2017.

Keywords: Hearing healthcare; access to care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis algorithm
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. [February 2, 2016];Occupational Hearing Loss (OHL) Surveillance. 2015 http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ohl/.
    1. Lin FR, Thorpe R, Gordon-Salant S, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2011;66(5):582–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen SM, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Primary care approach to hearing loss: the hidden disability. Ear, nose, & throat journal. 2005;84(1):26, 29–31, 44. - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Fleming C, Beil T. Screening adults aged 50 years or older for hearing loss: a review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of internal medicine. 2011;154(5):347–355. - PubMed
    1. Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) 2007;11(42):1–294. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources