[Study of postoperative anorectal dynamics in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection]
- PMID: 27545470
[Study of postoperative anorectal dynamics in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection]
Abstract
Objective: To study postoperative anorectal dynamic change in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.
Methods: Clinical and follow-up data of 26 ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in our department from January 2007 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed (observation group). Thirty rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection by the same surgical team in the same period from the Medical Record Room were randomly extracted as control group. The observation indexes included preoperative and postoperative anal resting pressure(ARP), anal maximum squeeze pressure (AMSP), rectal maximum tolerable volume (RMTV), rectal anal inhibition reflex (RAIR) and Wexner anal function scores (0 means normal).
Results: There were no significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05), except the distance from lower edge of tumor to dentate line [(2.9±0.4) cm in observation group vs. (5.0±0.5) cm in control group, P=0.000]. There were no differences in preoperative anorectal manometry and Wexner anal function score between two groups (all P>0.05). The average follow-up time in observation group and control group was 14.5 months and 14.0 months respectively. Three months after operation, significant differences between observation group and control group (all P=0.000) were as follows: defecation frequency [(6.0±1.5) times/day vs. (2.5±1.0) times/day], Wexner anal function score(5.0±0.9 vs. 2.9±1.2), ARP [(32.0±6.7) mmHg vs. (45.0±8.2) mmHg], AMSP [(90.1±6.9) mmHg vs. (110.0±7.5) mmHg], RMTV [(61.0±7.2) ml vs. (91.1±7.5) ml] and positive rate of RAIR [11.5%(3/26) vs. 66.7%(20/30)]. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in defecation frequency, Wexner anal function scores, ARP, AMSP and RMTV between the two groups (all P>0.05), however the difference in positive rate of RAIR was still significant[38.5%(10/26) vs. 93.3%(28/30), P=0.000].
Conclusion: Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra- low rectal cancer can achieve satisfactory anorectal dynamic effect.
Similar articles
-
[Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1137-1143. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.008. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31874529 Chinese.
-
Study of anorectal dynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic ultra-low resection and transanal intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.ANZ J Surg. 2020 Dec;90(12):2478-2483. doi: 10.1111/ans.16077. Epub 2020 Jun 21. ANZ J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32564466
-
The effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function.Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):e534-41. doi: 10.1111/codi.12311. Colorectal Dis. 2013. PMID: 23746076
-
The Review of Modified Intersphincteric Resection in the Treatment of Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Feb;26(2):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01291-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39847237 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anorectal physiology.Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;82(6):1115-23. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00080-4. Surg Clin North Am. 2002. PMID: 12516842 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical efficacy of different approaches for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: a comparison study.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb 22;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02521-5. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35193605 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous