Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;30(3):410-419.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12515. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

Developmental environment mediates male seminal protein investment in Drosophila melanogaster

Affiliations

Developmental environment mediates male seminal protein investment in Drosophila melanogaster

Stuart Wigby et al. Funct Ecol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Males of many species fine-tune their ejaculates in response to sperm competition risk. Resource availability and the number of competitors during development can also strongly influence sperm production. However, despite the key role of seminal proteins in mediating reproductive processes, it is unclear whether seminal protein investment is dependent on the developmental environment.We manipulated the developmental environment of Drosophila melanogaster by rearing flies at low and high density. As expected, this resulted in large and small (i.e. high and low condition) adult phenotypes, respectively.As predicted, large males produced more of two key seminal proteins, sex peptide (SP) and ovulin, and were more successful at obtaining matings with both virgin and previously mated females. However, there was only a weak and non-significant trend for large males to transfer more absolute quantities of SP at mating, and thus, small males ejaculated proportionally more of their stored accessory gland SP resources.Males transferred more receptivity-inhibiting SP to large females. Despite this, large females remated more quickly than small females and thus responded to their developmental environment over and above the quantity of SP they received.The results are consistent with two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses. First, flies might respond to condition-dependent reproductive opportunities, with (i) small males investing heavily in ejaculates when mating opportunities arise and large males strategically partitioning SP resources and (ii) small females remating at reduced rates because they have higher mating costs or need to replenish sperm less often.Second, flies may be primed by their larval environment to deal with similar adult population densities, with (i) males perceiving high density as signalling increased competition, leading small males to invest proportionally more SP resources at mating and (ii) females perceiving high density as signalling abundant potential mates, leading to a higher sexual receptivity threshold.Thus, by influencing the mating frequencies of both sexes, as well as the quantity of seminal proteins produced by males and received by females, the developmental environment is likely to have far-reaching and sex-specific consequences for sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Keywords: condition; density; development; ovulin; sex peptide; sexual selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sfp production by large (L) and small (S) males (mean ± SE). Quantities shown are relative to a male accessory gland standard. Sex peptide in male accessory glands (a) several days (3–6) after mating (Experiment 1), (b) immediately after mating or as virgins (Experiment 2), and (c) in response to large or small rival males (Experiment 2). (d) ovulin production in mated (3–6 days post‐mating) males (Experiment 1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sfp transfer to females (mean ± SE). L, large, S, small. Quantities shown are relative to a male accessory gland standard. Sex peptide (SP) present in the reproductive tracts of females (a) in response to male and female sizes (Experiment 1) and (b) in response to male size and the size of male rivals (Experiment 2). (c) Ovulin present in female reproductive tracts in response to male size (Experiment 1). These data were analysed separately (denoted by dashed line) for large and small females (see Materials and methods). (d) Estimated proportion of SP reserves transferred to females by large and small males (Experiment 2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
First mating (i.e. virgin) latency to mating (mean ± SE) in response to male and female sizes (a, c) and the size of male rivals (b). (a) Experiment 1, (b) Experiment 2, (c) Experiment 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Remating behaviour of large and small males and females. Large or small females were mated first to either a large or small male and then exposed for remating to either a large or small male. Squares = large first male, triangles = small first male; solid line = large female, dotted line = small female; black = large second male; red = small second male.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alonzo, S.H. & Pizzari, T. (2010) Male fecundity stimulation: conflict and cooperation within and between the sexes: model analyses and coevolutionary dynamics. The American Naturalist, 175, 174–185. - PubMed
    1. Amitin, E.G. & Pitnick, S. (2007) Influence of developmental environment on male‐ and female‐mediated sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster . Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 381–391. - PubMed
    1. Bangham, J. , Partridge, L. & Chapman, T. (2002) Effects of body size, accessory gland and testis size on pre‐ and postcopulatory success in Drosophila melanogaster . Animal Behaviour, 64, 915–921.
    1. Birkhead, T. , Hosken, D. & Pitnick, S. (2008) Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective. Academic Press, Waltham, Mass.
    1. Bolker, B.M. , Brooks, M.E. , Clark, C.J. , Geange, S.W. , Poulsen, J.R. , Stevens, M.H.H. et al (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127–135. - PubMed