Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 8;5(1):1284.
doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2954-2. eCollection 2016.

Has the pelvic renal stone position inside the upper loop of JJ stent any influence on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results?

Affiliations

Has the pelvic renal stone position inside the upper loop of JJ stent any influence on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results?

Catalin Pricop et al. Springerplus. .

Abstract

Background: JJ stents are often encountered in patients with pelvic renal stones referred for shock wave lithotripsy, most of them being placed either for obstructive renal pelvic stones or for ureteric stones mobilized retrograde during the JJ stent insertion. The aim of the study was to determine whether the relative stone position in the upper loop of the JJ stent during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) influences the efficiency of the procedure. The study was designed as a prospective cohort study on 162 patients addressing the same urological department, with single renal pelvic stone (primary or mobilized to the renal pelvis during the insertion of JJ stent), smaller than 15 mm, with JJ stent, treated by SWL using a second generation spark gap lithotripter, 18 kV, 3000 waves/session. Patients were divided in three groups according to the relative position of the stone to the upper loop of the JJ stent as appears on plain X-ray: stone-inside-loop, loop-crossing-stone and stone-outside the loop. The SWL success rate was the primary outcome of the study. p Value, Chi square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: For stone-inside-loop cases, SWL efficiency was 22.7 versus 42 % for all the other cases (p = 0.002). Other factors for decreased SWL success rate were: higher stone radio-opacity, larger JJ of stent and obese patients. Study limitation is represented by the relative small study group and by the evaluation of stone density using plain X-ray instead of computer tomography.

Conclusions: For pelvic renal stones having the same density characteristics studied by plain X-ray, the SWL efficiency is lower in stone-inside-loop cases comparing with the other positions. The overall stone free rate for renal pelvic stones could be explained by the second generation lithotripter used for all procedures.

Keywords: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Renal stones; Ureteral JJ stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
KUB of a patient from group A: stone inside the JJ loop
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
KUB of a patient from group B: loop-crossing-stone
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
KUB of a patient from group C: stone outside the JJ loop

References

    1. Alyami FA, Skinner TA, Norman RW. Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;15:1–5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argyropoulos AN, Tolley DA. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century. Eur Urol. 2007;52:344–354. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Argyropoulos AN, Tolley DA. Ureteric stents compromise stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones: results of a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;103:76–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07886.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bon D, Dore B, Irani J, Marroncle M, Aubert J. Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a study of 485 patients. Urology. 1996;48:556–560. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00251-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradley AJ, Rao PN. Imaging for stones. In: Rao PN, Preminger GM, Kavanagh JP, editors. Urinary tract stone disease. London: Springer; 2011.

LinkOut - more resources