Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 19;17(8):1193.
doi: 10.3390/ijms17081193.

Accumulation and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cells and Experimental Animals

Affiliations

Accumulation and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cells and Experimental Animals

Greta Jarockyte et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The uptake and distribution of negatively charged superparamagnetic iron oxide (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles (SPIONs) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts NIH3T3, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal influenced by SPIONs injected into experimental animals, were visualized and investigated. Cellular uptake and distribution of the SPIONs in NIH3T3 after staining with Prussian Blue were investigated by a bright-field microscope equipped with digital color camera. SPIONs were localized in vesicles, mostly placed near the nucleus. Toxicity of SPION nanoparticles tested with cell viability assay (XTT) was estimated. The viability of NIH3T3 cells remains approximately 95% within 3-24 h of incubation, and only a slight decrease of viability was observed after 48 h of incubation. MRI studies on Wistar rats using a clinical 1.5 T MRI scanner were showing that SPIONs give a negative contrast in the MRI. The dynamic MRI measurements of the SPION clearance from the injection site shows that SPIONs slowly disappear from injection sites and only a low concentration of nanoparticles was completely eliminated within three weeks. No functionalized SPIONs accumulate in cells by endocytic mechanism, none accumulate in the nucleus, and none are toxic at a desirable concentration. Therefore, they could be used as a dual imaging agent: as contrast agents for MRI and for traditional optical biopsy by using Prussian Blue staining.

Keywords: MRI-optical dual imaging; SPIONs; cellular uptake; iron oxide; magnetic nanoparticles; multifunctional cancer diagnostics; optical biopsy of tissues cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Topographic atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles dispersed on mica surface (B), particle height histogram (A), hydrodynamic size distribution (C) and schematic picture (D) of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fixed NIH3T3 cells after 0.5–72 h of incubation with 65 ng/mL of Fe3O4 (stained with Prussian Blue) (AF). The accumulation was observed using bright-field microscope equipped with digital color camera.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) viability of mouse embryonic fibroblasts NIH3T3, incubated with SPIONs for 3, 24 and 48 h. Toxicity of nanoparticles was investigated using XTT cell viability assay; (B) XTT plate images of NIH3T3 cells incubated with 32.5 ng/mL of SPION nanoparticles for 0, 24 and 48 h.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) T2W MR coronal slice images in vitro of different concentrations of Fe3O4 dissolved in water (from c1 (1300 mg/L) to c15 (13 mg/L)); (B) T2W MR signal intensity plot of aqueous suspensions of Fe3O4 versus the concentration in the solution. Dotted line marks water MR signal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
T2W MR coronal slice images of injection site at different time moments after intramuscular injection at dose of (A) 520 µg Fe3O4/kg (in the upper figure) and (B) 20.8 µg Fe3O4/kg (in the lower figure) in the rat left hind paw (red circles). The arrows marks injection site of physiological saline and Fe3O4 nanoparticles solution.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Relative MR signal intensity at the injection site versus time at the different doses of Fe3O4 (red curve—520 µg Fe3O4/kg, black—20.8 µg Fe3O4/kg).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Runge V.M., Clanton J.A., Lukehart C.M., Partain C.L., James A.E. Paramagnetic agents for contrast-enhanced NMR imaging: A review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1983;141:1209–1215. doi: 10.2214/ajr.141.6.1209. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caravan P. Strategies for increasing the sensitivity of gadolinium based MRI contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006;35:512–523. doi: 10.1039/b510982p. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edelman R.R., Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging (1) N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;328:708–716. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitchell D.G., Cohen M.S., Saunders W.B. MRI Principles. Saunders; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2004. p. 416.
    1. Lipinski M.J., Briley-Saebo K.C., Mani V., Fayad Z.A. “Positive contrast” inversion-recovery with oxide nanoparticles-resonant water suppression magnetic resonance imaging. JAAC. 2008;52:492–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources