Efficacy of Folic Acid Therapy on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: The Renal Substudy of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial
- PMID: 27548766
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4687
Efficacy of Folic Acid Therapy on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: The Renal Substudy of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial
Abstract
Importance: The efficacy of folic acid therapy on renal outcomes has not been previously investigated in populations without folic acid fortification.
Objective: To test whether treatment with enalapril and folic acid is more effective in slowing renal function decline than enalapril alone across a spectrum of renal function at baseline from normal to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) among Chinese adults with hypertension.
Design, setting, and participants: In this substudy of eligible China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT), 15 104 participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater, including 1671 patients with CKD, were recruited from 20 communities in Jiangsu province in China.
Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive a single tablet daily containing 10 mg enalapril and 0.8 mg folic acid (n = 7545) or 10 mg enalapril alone (n = 7559).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the progression of CKD, defined as a decrease in eGFR of 30% or more and to a level of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 if the baseline eGFR was 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more, or a decrease in eGFR of 50% or more if the baseline eGFR was less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; or end-stage renal disease. Secondary outcomes included a composite of the primary outcome and all-cause death, rapid decline in renal function, and rate of eGFR decline.
Results: Overall, 15 104 Chinese adults with a mean (range) age of 60 (45-75) years were recruited; median follow-up was 4.4 years. There were 164 and 132 primary events in the enalapril group and the enalapril-folic acid group, respectively. Compared with the enalapril group, the enalapril-folic acid group had a 21% reduction in the odds of the primary event (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00) and a slower rate of eGFR decline (1.28% vs 1.42% per year; P = .02). Among the participants with CKD at baseline, folic acid therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the risks for the primary event (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.75), rapid decline in renal function (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96) and the composite event (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90), and a 44% slower decline in renal function (0.96% vs 1.72% per year, P < .001). Among those without CKD at baseline, there was no between-group difference in the primary end point.
Conclusions and relevance: Enalapril-folic acid therapy, compared with enalapril alone, can significantly delay the progression of CKD among patients with mild-to-moderate CKD.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00794885.
Comment in
-
Time to Think About Nutrient Needs in Chronic Disease.JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1451-1452. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4699. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27548386 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Nutrition: Folic acid delays CKD progression.Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016 Oct;12(10):580. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.136. Epub 2016 Sep 12. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 27615368 No abstract available.
-
The Nephroprotective Effect of Folic Acid-Only a Matter of Homocysteine?JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):285-286. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8580. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28166344 No abstract available.
-
The Nephroprotective Effect of Folic Acid-Only a Matter of Homocysteine?JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):286. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8583. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28166345 No abstract available.
-
The Nephroprotective Effect of Folic Acid-Only a Matter of Homocysteine?-Reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):286-287. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8593. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28166354 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous