Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives
- PMID: 27549085
- PMCID: PMC4994313
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0730-1
Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical students' and tutors' perspectives
Abstract
Background: Collaboration is of increasing importance in medical education and medical practice. Students' and tutors' perceptions about small group learning are valuable to inform the development of strategies to promote group dynamics and collaborative learning. This study investigated medical students' and tutors' views on competencies and behaviours which promote effective learning and interaction in small group settings.
Methods: This study was conducted at UNSW Australia. Five focus group discussions were conducted with first and second year medical students and eight small group tutors were interviewed. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was conducted.
Results: Students and tutors identified a range of behaviours that influenced collaborative learning. The main themes that emerged included: respectfulness; dominance, strong opinions and openness; constructiveness of feedback; active listening and contribution; goal orientation; acceptance of roles and responsibilities; engagement and enthusiasm; preparedness; self- awareness and positive personal attributes. An important finding was that some of these student behaviours were found to have a differential impact on group interaction compared with collaborative learning. This information could be used to promote higher quality learning in small groups.
Conclusion: This study has identified medical students' and tutors' perceptions regarding interactional behaviours in small groups, as well as behaviours which lead to more effective learning in those settings. This information could be used to promote learning in small groups.
Keywords: Collaborative learning; Group interaction; Small group learning.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0815-x. BMC Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 27846882 Free PMC article.
-
Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Nov;12(4):427-39. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9008-4. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007. PMID: 16847731
-
The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning.Med Educ. 2006 Aug;40(8):730-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02530.x. Med Educ. 2006. PMID: 16869917
-
The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review.BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 23;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z. BMC Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31443705 Free PMC article.
-
Learning by making - student-made models and creative projects for medical education: systematic review with qualitative synthesis.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06716-8. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 39881268 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Enhanced learning strategies of undergraduate medical students with a structured case presentation format.J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Nov 30;10:424. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_21. eCollection 2021. J Educ Health Promot. 2021. PMID: 35071630 Free PMC article.
-
Determining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 May 30;15(3):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.002. eCollection 2020 Jun. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32647511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e045345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33563627 Free PMC article.
-
A webinar series to educate applicants about the UK academic foundation programme: a longitudinal cross-sectional study.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Dec 29;22(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03961-z. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 36581834 Free PMC article.
-
The collaborative learning development exercise (CLeD-EX): an educational instrument to promote key collaborative learning behaviours in medical students.BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1977-0. BMC Med Educ. 2020. PMID: 32122344 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Davidson N, Major CH. Boundary crossings: cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. J Excell Coll Teach. 2014;25(3 & 4):7–55.
-
- Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Teaching and learning in medical education: How theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick ET, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. 5. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. pp. 57–60.
-
- Australian Medical Council Limited . Accreditation standards for primary medical education providers and their program of study and graduate outcome statements. 2012.
-
- General Medical Council . Tomorrow's doctors: outcomes for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 2015.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources