Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Apr;102(4):301-302.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310525. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

Eye-tracking-based assessment of cognitive function in low-resource settings

Linda Forssman  1 , Per Ashorn  1   2 , Ulla Ashorn  1 , Kenneth Maleta  3 , Andrew Matchado  3 , Emma Kortekangas  1 , Jukka M Leppänen  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Eye-tracking-based assessment of cognitive function in low-resource settings

Linda Forssman et al. Arch Dis Child. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Early development of neurocognitive functions in infants can be compromised by poverty, malnutrition and lack of adequate stimulation. Optimal management of neurodevelopmental problems in infants requires assessment tools that can be used early in life, and are objective and applicable across economic, cultural and educational settings.

Objective and design: The present study examined the feasibility of infrared eye tracking as a novel and highly automated technique for assessing visual-orienting and sequence-learning abilities as well as attention to facial expressions in young (9-month-old) infants. Techniques piloted in a high-resource laboratory setting in Finland (N=39) were subsequently field-tested in a community health centre in rural Malawi (N=40).

Results: Parents' perception of the acceptability of the method (Finland 95%, Malawi 92%) and percentages of infants completing the whole eye-tracking test (Finland 95%, Malawi 90%) were high, and percentages of valid test trials (Finland 69-85%, Malawi 68-73%) satisfactory at both sites. Test completion rates were slightly higher for eye tracking (90%) than traditional observational tests (87%) in Malawi. The predicted response pattern indicative of specific cognitive function was replicated in Malawi, but Malawian infants exhibited lower response rates and slower processing speed across tasks.

Conclusions: High test completion rates and the replication of the predicted test patterns in a novel environment in Malawi support the feasibility of eye tracking as a technique for assessing infant development in low-resource setting. Further research is needed to the test-retest stability and predictive validity of the eye-tracking scores in low-income settings.

Keywords: Neurodevelopment; cognition; infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of eye-tracking sessions in Finland (top left) and Malawi (top right), and paradigms designed to test infants’ visual orientation abilities (visual search), sequence-learning abilities (switch task) and attention to facial expressions of emotion (disengagement).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • What can eye-tracking tell us?
    Boardman JP, Fletcher-Watson S. Boardman JP, et al. Arch Dis Child. 2017 Apr;102(4):301-302. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311693. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Arch Dis Child. 2017. PMID: 28073740 No abstract available.

References

    1. Nelson CA III, Zeanah CH, Fox NA, et al. . Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest early intervention project. Science 2007;318:1937–40. 10.1126/science.1143921 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Georgieff MK. Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:614S–20S. - PubMed
    1. Knudsen EI, Heckman JJ, Cameron JL, et al. . Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America's future workforce. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006;103:10155–62. 10.1073/pnas.0600888103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabanathan S, Wills B, Gladstone M. Child development assessment tools in low-income and middle-income countries: how can we use them more appropriately? Arch Dis Child 2015;100:482–8. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, et al. . Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet 2011;378:1325–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60555-2 - DOI - PubMed