Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 23:3:160067.
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.67.

Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009

Affiliations

Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009

Oscar Venter et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

Remotely-sensed and bottom-up survey information were compiled on eight variables measuring the direct and indirect human pressures on the environment globally in 1993 and 2009. This represents not only the most current information of its type, but also the first temporally-consistent set of Human Footprint maps. Data on human pressures were acquired or developed for: 1) built environments, 2) population density, 3) electric infrastructure, 4) crop lands, 5) pasture lands, 6) roads, 7) railways, and 8) navigable waterways. Pressures were then overlaid to create the standardized Human Footprint maps for all non-Antarctic land areas. A validation analysis using scored pressures from 3114×1 km(2) random sample plots revealed strong agreement with the Human Footprint maps. We anticipate that the Human Footprint maps will find a range of uses as proxies for human disturbance of natural systems. The updated maps should provide an increased understanding of the human pressures that drive macro-ecological patterns, as well as for tracking environmental change and informing conservation science and application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow of the Human Footprint approach to mapping cumulative human pressures on the environment.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Human Footprint map for 2009, with panels showing regional overlays with the results of the validation plots.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results from 3114×1 km2 validation plots interpreted and scored following Supplementary Appendix 1.
(a) The location and visually interpreted pressure score for plots, and (b) the disagreement between the Human Footprint score and the visual validation score on a normalized 0–1 scale.

References

Data Citations

    1. Venter O , et al. . 2016. Dryad. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.052q5 - DOI
    1. Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University2016. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center . http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4XK8CG2 - DOI
    1. DeFries R. S., Hansen M. 2010. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center. http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/969 - DOI
    1. Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University, Information Technology Outreach Services—ITOS—University of Georgia2013. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center . http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4VD6WCT - DOI

References

    1. Martins J. H., Camanho A. S. & Gaspar M. B. A review of the application of driving forces—Pressure—State—Impact—Response framework to fisheries management. Ocean & Coastal Management 69, 273–281 (2012).
    1. Borja A. et al. The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 66, 84–96 (2006).
    1. Halpern B. S. & Fujita R. Assumptions, challenges, and future directions in cumulative impact analysis. Ecosphere 4, art131 (2013).
    1. Voeroesmarty C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity (vol 467, pg 555, 2010). Nature 468, 334–334 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Potapov P. et al. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol Soc 13, 51 (2008).

Publication types