Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;401(8):1111-1122.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1499-8. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection

Affiliations

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection

Emanuele F Kauffmann et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to define the current status of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) with resection and reconstruction of the superior mesenteric/portal vein (RPD-SMV/PV).

Methods: Our experience on RPD, including RPD-SMV/PV, is presented along with a description of the surgical technique and a systematic review of the literature on RPD-SMV/PV.

Results: We have performed 116 RPD and 14 RPD-SMV/PV. Seven additional cases of RPD-SMV/PV were identified in the literature. In our experience, RPD and RPD-SMV/PV were similar in all baseline variables, but lower mean body mass and higher prevalence of pancreatic cancer in RPD-SMV/PV. Regarding the type of vein resection, there were one type 2 (7.1 %), five type 3 (35.7 %) and eight type 4 (57.2 %) resections. As compared to RPD, RPD-SMV/PV required longer operative time, had higher median estimated blood loss, and blood transfusions were required more frequently. Incidence and severity of post-operative complications were not increased in RPD-SMV/PV, but post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage occurred more frequently after this procedure. In pancreatic cancer, RPD-SMV/PV was associated with a higher mean number of examined lymph nodes (60.0 ± 13.9 vs 44.6 ± 11.0; p = 0.02) and with the same rate of microscopic margin positivity (25.0 % vs 26.1 %). Mean length or resected vein was 23.1 ± 8.08 mm. Actual tumour infiltration was discovered in ten patients (71.4 %), reaching the adventitia in four patients (40.0 %), the media in two patients (20.0 %), and the intima in four patients (40.0 %). Literature review identified seven additional cases, all reported to have successful outcome.

Conclusions: RPD-SMV/PV is feasible in carefully selected patients. The generalization of these results remains to be demonstrated.

Keywords: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy; Pancreas cancer; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy; Vein resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr;399(4):461-71 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1425-32 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1646-57 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):633-8; discussion 638-40 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2006 Oct;93(10):1232-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources