Two-week postpartum intrauterine contraception insertion: a study of feasibility, patient acceptability and short-term outcomes
- PMID: 27554014
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.005
Two-week postpartum intrauterine contraception insertion: a study of feasibility, patient acceptability and short-term outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of inserting the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, LNG 52 mg IUS (LNG IUS), at 2 weeks postpartum.
Study design: This prospective study of feasibility and patient acceptability recruited women interested in a postpartum LNG IUS and placed the LNG IUS under ultrasound guidance on days 14-20 postpartum. We determined feasibility by our ability to recruit and insert the LNG IUS in our predetermined sample size of 50 women. We measured our primary acceptability outcome at 6 months postpartum with the question: "Would you recommend Mirena placement at 2 weeks postpartum to a friend?" Other outcomes included expulsion and pain. The three study visits consisted of (1) insertion visit (14-20 days postpartum), (2) standard postpartum visit with a string check (6 weeks postpartum) and (3) research visit with sonography and assessment of the primary outcome (6 months postpartum).
Results: We enrolled 50 women over 8 months, all of whom received LNG IUS. Forty-three of the 50 (86%) provided follow-up data for the primary outcome. Of those, 93% (40/43) would recommend 2-week LNG IUS insertion to a friend, and 86% (37/43) continued using their LNG IUS at the conclusion of the 6-month visit. There were two partial expulsions; one was symptomatic. There were no uterine perforations.
Conclusions: LNG IUS inserted at 2 weeks postpartum is feasible and acceptable to patients. These results offer evidence to support intrauterine contraception insertion prior to the onset of ovulation and at a potentially more convenient time point in the postpartum period.
Implications: This study supports offering the LNG IUS beginning on the 14th postpartum day. The 4% expulsion rate is consistent with the rate of interval insertion and lower than immediate postplacental insertion. Additional research is needed to ensure a low risk of adverse events with other brands of intrauterine contraception.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02121067.
Keywords: Intrauterine device; Intrauterine device insertion; LARC; LNG IUS; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Postpartum contraception.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A randomised clinical trial to assess satisfaction with the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system inserted at caesarean section compared to postpartum placement.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jun;55(3):279-83. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12335. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015. PMID: 26053465 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1580-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev102. Epub 2015 May 19. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25990577
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):182-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016. PMID: 27032746 English, French.
-
Usage of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in adolescence: what is the evidence so far?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Mar;295(3):529-541. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4261-0. Epub 2016 Dec 7. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 27928678 Review.
-
The effect of early vs. delayed postpartum insertion of the LNG-IUS on breastfeeding continuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Oct;24(5):327-336. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1665175. Epub 2019 Sep 13. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019. PMID: 31517549
Cited by
-
Postplacental Insertion of Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Versus Copper Intrauterine Device: A Prospective Study.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Apr;71(2):150-155. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01409-2. Epub 2021 Jan 20. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021. PMID: 34149217 Free PMC article.
-
Early vs Interval Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2023 Mar 21;329(11):910-917. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1936. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 36943214 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.045. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32142826 Free PMC article.
-
Correlates of Receiving Guideline-Concordant Postpartum Health Services in the Community Health Center Setting.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Feb 7;3(1):180-193. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0084. eCollection 2022. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022. PMID: 35262055 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 18. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 29778586 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical