Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;32(4):179-205.
doi: 10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination

Affiliations
Review

Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination

Petr Karlovsky et al. Mycotoxin Res. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites commonly occurring in food, which pose a health risk to the consumer. Maximum levels for major mycotoxins allowed in food have been established worldwide. Good agricultural practices, plant disease management, and adequate storage conditions limit mycotoxin levels in the food chain yet do not eliminate mycotoxins completely. Food processing can further reduce mycotoxin levels by physical removal and decontamination by chemical or enzymatic transformation of mycotoxins into less toxic products. Physical removal of mycotoxins is very efficient: manual sorting of grains, nuts, and fruits by farmers as well as automatic sorting by the industry significantly lowers the mean mycotoxin content. Further processing such as milling, steeping, and extrusion can also reduce mycotoxin content. Mycotoxins can be detoxified chemically by reacting with food components and technical aids; these reactions are facilitated by high temperature and alkaline or acidic conditions. Detoxification of mycotoxins can also be achieved enzymatically. Some enzymes able to transform mycotoxins naturally occur in food commodities or are produced during fermentation but more efficient detoxification can be achieved by deliberate introduction of purified enzymes. We recommend integrating evaluation of processing technologies for their impact on mycotoxins into risk management. Processing steps proven to mitigate mycotoxin contamination should be used whenever necessary. Development of detoxification technologies for high-risk commodities should be a priority for research. While physical techniques currently offer the most efficient post-harvest reduction of mycotoxin content in food, biotechnology possesses the largest potential for future developments.

Keywords: Biological detoxification; Chemical treatment; Decontamination; Mitigation; Natural toxins; Physical methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of funding This work was commissioned by the Process-related Compounds and Natural Toxins Task Force of the European branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI Europe). Industry members of this task force (2013–2016) are Abbott Nutrition, ADM, Barilla G&R Fratelli, Bunge Europe, Campbell, Cargill, Kao Corporation, Kellog Europe, Kikkoman Foods Europe, Luigi Lavazza, Mondelez International, Mars, Nestlé, PepsiCo International, Premier Foods, Südzucker/BENEO Group, Unilever. The opinions expressed herein and the conclusions of this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ILSI Europe nor those of its member companies. Conflict of interest Academic members of this expert group received support from ILSI Europe the Process-related Compounds and Natural Toxins Task Force, consisting of reimbursement of travel costs and a small honorarium.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Chemical structures of major mycotoxins and modification due to food processing. 1 de-epoxidation, 2 acetylation, 3 oxidation, 4 epimerization, 5 deamination, 6 glucosylation, 7 hydrolysis, 8 lactone cleavage (hydrolysis), 9 hydroxylation, 10 peptide cleavage, 11 sulfonation, 12 reduction, 13 ether cleavage
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of physical and chemical processes applicable to food commodities in order to mitigate targeted mycotoxins. *Conversion to a more estrogenic cis-form. **Experimentally demonstrated on apple juice

References

    1. Abalaka JA, Elegbede JA. Aflatoxin distribution and total microbial counts in an edible oil extracting plant. Preliminary observations. Food Chem Toxicol. 1982;20:43–46. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(82)80007-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abd Alla ES. Zearalenone: incidence, toxigenic fungi and chemical decontamination in Egyptian cereals. Nahrung. 1997;41:362–365. doi: 10.1002/food.19970410610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrunhosa L, Paterson RRM, Venâncio A. Biodegradation of ochratoxin a for food and feed decontamination. Toxins. 2010;2:1078–1099. doi: 10.3390/toxins2051078. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afolabi CG, Ojiambo PS, Ekpo EJA, Menkir M, Bandyopadhyay R. Evaluation of maize inbred lines for resistance to Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin accumulation in grain in tropical Africa. Plant Dis. 2007;91:279–286. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-3-0279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afriyie-Gyawu E, Ankrah NA, Huebner HJ, Ofosuhene M, Kumi J, Johnson NM, Tang L, Xu L, Jolly PE, Ellis W, Ofori-Adjei D, Williams JH, Wang JS, Phillips TD. NovaSil clay intervention in Ghanaians at high risk for aflatoxicosis. I. Study design and clinical outcomes. Food Addit Contam. 2008;25:76–87. doi: 10.1080/02652030701458105. - DOI - PubMed