Participant Preferences for Pharmacologic Chronic Pain Treatment Trial Characteristics: An ACTTION Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Study
- PMID: 27555429
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.07.008
Participant Preferences for Pharmacologic Chronic Pain Treatment Trial Characteristics: An ACTTION Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Study
Abstract
Barriers to clinical trial recruitment can delay study completion, potentially resulting in increased costs and an unrepresentative sample. In the current study of 150 participants with chronic pain, we used a computerized adaptive choice-based conjoint survey that included 8 characteristics that may affect enrollment in pharmacologic pain treatment trials (ie, treatment allocation, frequency of pain ratings, treatment administration method, current medications, number of study visits, availability of evening and weekend visits, invasiveness of laboratory procedures, payment). These data were analyzed using Sawtooth Software ver. 8.4.8 (Sawtooth Software, Inc, Orem, UT), which identifies the characteristics that dominate participants' decisions across multiple sets of potential trials. Three characteristics had the largest relative importance in participants' trial preferences: 1) invasiveness of required laboratory procedures (ie, 22%), with no procedures or blood tests preferred over ice-water sensory testing or skin biopsy; 2) ability to continue current pain medications (21%); and 3) payment for study participation (21%), with higher payment preferred. The fourth most important characteristic was number of study visits (13%), with participants preferring fewer in-person visits and more phone contacts. Understanding the preferences of potential participants is an important step toward enhancing enrollment in pain treatment trials.
Perspective: This article presents the preferences of individuals with chronic pain conditions regarding modifiable pain treatment trial characteristics (eg, number of study visits, payment, treatment allocation). These findings may help to improve enrollment into analgesic clinical trials and in turn accelerate the development of new pain treatments.
Keywords: Pain; conjoint analysis; randomized controlled trial; recruitment.
Copyright © 2016 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Personal preferences for Personalised Trials among patients with chronic diseases: an empirical Bayesian analysis of a conjoint survey.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 7;10(6):e036056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036056. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32513886 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic pain treatment preferences change following participation in N-of-1 trials, but not always in the expected direction.J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 34400254 Free PMC article.
-
A discrete choice experiment: Understanding patient preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain.Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4760. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4760. Epub 2024 Nov 27. Eur J Pain. 2025. PMID: 39601351
-
Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1148-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 9. Pain. 2012. PMID: 22494920
-
Early phase drug development for treatment of chronic pain--options for clinical trial and program design.Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):689-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Feb 27. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22401888 Review.
Cited by
-
Conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention in adults with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jan 24;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01247-9. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023. PMID: 36694217 Free PMC article.
-
The ACTTION Guide to Clinical Trials of Pain Treatments, part II: mitigating bias, maximizing value.Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e886. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000886. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. Pain Rep. 2021. PMID: 33521484 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment Preferences for Chronic Low Back Pain: Views of Veterans and Their Providers.J Pain Res. 2021 Jan 27;14:161-171. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S290400. eCollection 2021. J Pain Res. 2021. PMID: 33536780 Free PMC article.
-
Recruitment and retention of clinical trial participants: understanding motivations of patients with chronic pain and other populations.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 28;4:1330937. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1330937. eCollection 2023. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38606348 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Design and conduct of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials.Pain Rep. 2020 Dec 18;6(1):e845. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000854. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. Pain Rep. 2020. PMID: 33511323 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical