Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 6;113(36):10049-54.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606294113. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

Catalytic strategy for carbon-carbon bond scission by the cytochrome P450 OleT

Affiliations

Catalytic strategy for carbon-carbon bond scission by the cytochrome P450 OleT

Job L Grant et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

OleT is a cytochrome P450 that catalyzes the hydrogen peroxide-dependent metabolism of Cn chain-length fatty acids to synthesize Cn-1 1-alkenes. The decarboxylation reaction provides a route for the production of drop-in hydrocarbon fuels from a renewable and abundant natural resource. This transformation is highly unusual for a P450, which typically uses an Fe(4+)-oxo intermediate known as compound I for the insertion of oxygen into organic substrates. OleT, previously shown to form compound I, catalyzes a different reaction. A large substrate kinetic isotope effect (≥8) for OleT compound I decay confirms that, like monooxygenation, alkene formation is initiated by substrate C-H bond abstraction. Rather than finalizing the reaction through rapid oxygen rebound, alkene synthesis proceeds through the formation of a reaction cycle intermediate with kinetics, optical properties, and reactivity indicative of an Fe(4+)-OH species, compound II. The direct observation of this intermediate, normally fleeting in hydroxylases, provides a rationale for the carbon-carbon scission reaction catalyzed by OleT.

Keywords: compound II; cytochrome P450; hydrocarbon; metal−oxo; oxygen activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The decarboxylation reaction catalyzed by OleT. Using a hydrogen peroxide cosubstrate, OleT metabolizes a Cn chain-length fatty acid to produce a Cn-1 alkene and carbon dioxide coproduct.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Stopped-flow absorption evidence for a substrate 2H KIE in the OleT reaction. Representative single-wavelength time course for the reaction of 20 μM OleT−D39-EA (red) or OleT−H39-EA (blue, and Inset) with 10 mM H2O2 monitored at 370 nm. The superimposed white traces represent two-summed exponential fits to the data.
Fig. S1.
Fig. S1.
Representative time courses (black), superimposed fits (red), and residuals for the 20 μM OleT−EA + 10 mM H2O2 time course using single-wavelength detection for (A) D39-EA at 370 nm, (B) H39-EA at 370 nm, (C) D39-EA at 440 nm, and (D) H39-EA at 440 nm.
Fig. S2.
Fig. S2.
Time course for the 20 μM OleT−D39-EA + 10 mM H2O2 reaction (black) using single-wavelength detection at 690 nm, single exponential fit (red), and residuals.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Identification of an additional intermediate (Int-2) that forms concomitant with OleT compound I (Ole-I) decay. PDA spectra of a single-turnover reaction of 20 μM OleT−D39-EA with 10 mM H2O2 in (A) 2- to 40-ms and (B) 40- to 500-ms timeframes. (C) The OleT−H39-EA + H2O2 reaction, from 2 ms to 500 ms. Insets represent kinetic difference spectra, 500 ms to 40 ms (in B) and 500 ms to 10 ms (in C).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Transient kinetics of Int-2 formation and decay. (A) Representative single-wavelength time course for the reaction of 20 μM OleT−D39-EA (red) or OleT−H39-EA (blue) with 10 mM H2O2 monitored at 440 nm. The superimposed white traces represent two-summed exponential fits to the data. (B) Plots of the dependence of the larger RRT on H2O2 concentration in respective colors. The solid lines represent nonlinear fitting to a hyperbolic expression (for the D39-EA reaction) and linear fitting (H39-EA). The Inset shows the decay rate of Ole-I at 370 nm and formation rate of Int-2 for the OleT–D39-EA reaction.
Fig. S3.
Fig. S3.
Peroxide independence and isotopic insensitivity of the slower RRT associated with Int-2 decay at 440 nm.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Summary of the kinetic parameters for OleT compound I formation, and subsequent decay to Int-2 and the low-spin ferric enzyme. The decay rate constants for Ole-I with D39-EA and H39-EA are indicated as kD and kH, respectively. The formation of nonadecene and carbon dioxide was demonstrated in a previous study (35).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Optical spectroscopic features and reactivity of Int-2. (A) The pure component spectra of OleT Int-2 (orange) and compound I (green) as obtained from global fitting analysis of PDA data, and compared with the ferric H2O low-spin enzyme (blue). (B) Plot of the apparent Int-2 decay rate constant with phenol (circle) and 3-chlorophenol (square). OleT−H39-EA (40 μM) was mixed with 2 mM H2O2, aged 20 ms, and then mixed 1:1 with substituted phenols. The concentrations shown are after mixing. Error bars represent 1 SD.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Speciation plots for OleT reaction cycle intermediates computed using rate constants determined in single-wavelength studies with (A) D39-EA and (B) H39-EA. Rate constants are first-order (per second) or pseudo-first-order for the H2O2 concentration used.
Fig. S5.
Fig. S5.
(A) Comparison of the optical absorption spectra of OleT Int-2 (red), ferric H2O (blue), and ferric OH (black) forms of the enzyme. The ferric hydroxide form was generated by a rapid pH jump to 12, and is stable for several seconds before decomposition. (B) Difference spectra of the ferric hydroxide (black) and Int-2 minus ferric H2O (red) forms show that the two species are readily distinguishable.
Fig. S6.
Fig. S6.
Global analysis independent determination of Int-2 optical spectrum by linear combination. (A) The visible spectrum of the OleT–H39-EA + H2O2 reaction at 50 ms (black) with a weighted ferric low-spin reference (blue) and Int-2 spectrum (red). (B) Overlay of the spectrum of Int-2 determined by SVD (red) and linear subtraction methods (black). (C) Speciation plots of Int-2 and the ferric low-spin species using rates determined from fitting single-wavelength data at 440 nm. A dashed line shows the predicted fraction of each species at the time point of interest. (D) The visible spectrum of the OleT–D39-EA + H2O2 reaction at 50 ms (black) with a weighted ferric low-spin reference (blue) and Int-2 spectrum (red). (E) Overlay of the spectrum of Int-2 determined by SVD (red) and linear subtraction methods (black). (F) Speciation plots of Int-2 and the ferric low-spin species using rates determined from fitting single-wavelength data at 440 nm. (G) The visible spectrum of the OleT–D39-EA + H2O2 reaction at 100 ms (black) with a weighted ferric low-spin reference (blue) and Int-2 spectrum (red). (H) Overlay of the spectrum of Int-2 determined by SVD (red) and linear subtraction methods (black). (I) Speciation plots of Int-2 and the ferric low-spin species using rates determined from fitting single-wavelength data at 440 nm.
Fig. S7.
Fig. S7.
Double-mixing studies to probe the reactivity of Int-2 toward phenols. Int-2 was generated by mixing 40 μM OleT−H39-EA with 4 mM H2O2. After aging for 20 ms, the resulting solution was mixed 1:1 with buffered phenols at various concentrations. Representative time traces at 440 nm and superimposed single exponential fits (red) are shown for a reaction with no phenol (black) and with 10 mM 4-Cl-phenol (gray). The observed rates for these reactions are kobs = 7.3 and 26.7 s−1 respectively.
Fig. S8.
Fig. S8.
The pH dependence of the Int-2 decay rate. OleT−D39-EA was prepared at several pHs using a 200 mM KH2PO4, 125 mM l-arginine buffer and was rapidly mixed with similarly buffered 500 μM H2O2. The spectral changes associated with Int-2 decay were monitored at 440 nm. The lnkdecay shows a linear dependence on pH, with a slope = 1.05 ± 0.07, consistent with a proton-coupled electron transfer involved in the conversion of Fe4+−OH to Fe3+−OH2.

References

    1. Ortiz de Montellano PR. Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. 3rd Ed Kluwer Academic; New York: 2005.
    1. Denisov IG, Makris TM, Sligar SG, Schlichting I. Structure and chemistry of cytochrome P450. Chem Rev. 2005;105(6):2253–2277. - PubMed
    1. Bangcharoenpaurpong O, Rizos AK, Champion PM, Jollie D, Sligar SG. Resonance Raman detection of bound dioxygen in cytochrome P-450cam. J Biol Chem. 1986;261(18):8089–8092. - PubMed
    1. Hu S, Schneider AJ, Kincaid JR. Resonance Raman studies of oxycytochrome P450cam: Effect of substrate structure on ν(O−O) and ν(Fe−O2) J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113(13):4815–4822.
    1. Sharrock M, et al. Cytochrome P450cam and its complexes. Mössbauer parameters of the heme iron. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976;420(1):8–26. - PubMed

Publication types