Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul 14;8(7):e688.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.688.

Are External Cervical Orthoses Necessary after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review of the Literature

Richard Camara  1 , Olaide O Ajayi  1 , Farbod Asgarzadie  2
Affiliations
Review

Are External Cervical Orthoses Necessary after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review of the Literature

Richard Camara et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction & background: The use of external cervical orthosis (ECO) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) varies from physician to physician due to an absence of clear guidelines. Our purpose is to evaluate and present evidence answering the question, "Does ECO after ACDF improve fusion rates?" through a literature review of current evidence for and against ECO after ACDF.

Review: A PubMed database search was conducted using specific ECO and ACDF related keywords. Our search yielded a total of 1,267 abstracts and seven relevant articles. In summary, one study provided low quality of evidence results supporting the conclusion that external bracing is not associated with improved fusion rates after ACDF. The remaining six studies provide very low quality of evidence results; two studies concluded that external bracing after cervical procedures is not associated with improved fusion rates, one study concluded that external bracing after cervical procedures is associated with improved fusion rates, and the remaining three studies lacked sufficient evidence to draw an association between external bracing after ACDF and improved fusion rates.

Conclusion: We recommend against the routine use of ECO after ACDF due to a lack of improved fusion rates associated with external bracing after surgery.

Keywords: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical brace; cervical collar; external cervical orthoses; neurosurgery; post-operative collar; spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. The management and prevention of rigid cervical collar complications. Webber-Jones JE, Thomas CA, Bordeaux RE Jr. Orthop Nurs. 2002;21:19–25. - PubMed
    1. The effectiveness of four contemporary cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. Lunsford TR, Davidson M, Lunsford BR. http://journals.lww.com/jpojournal/Abstract/1994/06040/The_Effectiveness... J Prosthetics & Orthotics. 1994;6:93–99.
    1. The effect of rigid cervical collar height on full, active, and functional range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living. Miller CP, Bible JE, Jegede KA, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Spine. 2010;35:0. - PubMed
    1. Controversy: bracing of patients after fusion for degenerative problems of the lumbar spine--yes or no? Connolly PJ, Grob D. Spine. 1998;23:1426–1428. - PubMed
    1. The effects of cervical bracing upon swallowing in young, normal, healthy volunteers. Stambolis V, Brady S, Klos D, Wesling M, Fatianov T, Hildner C. Dysphagia. 2003;18:39–45. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources