Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:2016:3856262.
doi: 10.1155/2016/3856262. Epub 2016 Jul 31.

Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Repair: Generations of Biomaterial Conduits Yielding to Replacing Autologous Nerve Grafts in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Repair: Generations of Biomaterial Conduits Yielding to Replacing Autologous Nerve Grafts in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

Robert Gaudin et al. Biomed Res Int. 2016.

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury is a common clinical entity, which may arise due to traumatic, tumorous, or even iatrogenic injury in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Despite advances in biomaterials and techniques over the past several decades, reconstruction of nerve gaps remains a challenge. Autografts are the gold standard for nerve reconstruction. Using autografts, there is donor site morbidity, subsequent sensory deficit, and potential for neuroma development and infection. Moreover, the need for a second surgical site and limited availability of donor nerves remain a challenge. Thus, increasing efforts have been directed to develop artificial nerve guidance conduits (ANCs) as new methods to replace autografts in the future. Various synthetic conduit materials have been tested in vitro and in vivo, and several first- and second-generation conduits are FDA approved and available for purchase, while third-generation conduits still remain in experimental stages. This paper reviews the current treatment options, summarizes the published literature, and assesses future prospects for the repair of peripheral nerve injury in craniomaxillofacial surgery with a particular focus on facial nerve regeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cross section buccal branch of the facial nerve, Toluidine Blue, 40x/1.3 oil, Zeiss Microscope.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Generations of nerve conduits and future perspectives.

References

    1. Ichihara S., Inada Y., Nakamura T. Artificial nerve tubes and their application for repair of peripheral nerve injury: an update of current concepts. Injury. 2008;39(supplement 4):29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yiu G., He Z. Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2006;7(8):617–627. doi: 10.1038/nrn1956. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74(4):491–516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reid A. J., de Luca A. C., Faroni A., et al. Long term peripheral nerve regeneration using a novel PCL nerve conduit. Neuroscience Letters. 2013;544:125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Witzel C., Rohde C., Brushart T. M. Pathway sampling by regenerating peripheral axons. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2005;485(3):183–190. doi: 10.1002/cne.20436. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances