Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:2016:6262383.
doi: 10.1155/2016/6262383. Epub 2016 Jul 31.

Emerging Technologies and Generic Assays for the Detection of Anti-Drug Antibodies

Affiliations
Review

Emerging Technologies and Generic Assays for the Detection of Anti-Drug Antibodies

Michael A Partridge et al. J Immunol Res. 2016.

Abstract

Anti-drug antibodies induced by biologic therapeutics often impact drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics response, clinical efficacy, and patient safety. It is critical to assess the immunogenicity risk of potential biotherapeutics in producing neutralizing and nonneutralizing anti-drug antibodies, especially in clinical phases of drug development. Different assay methodologies have been used to detect all anti-drug antibodies, including ELISA, radioimmunoassay, surface plasmon resonance, and electrochemiluminescence-based technologies. The most commonly used method is a bridging assay, performed in an ELISA or on the Meso Scale Discovery platform. In this report, we aim to review the emerging new assay technologies that can complement or address challenges associated with the bridging assay format in screening and confirmation of ADAs. We also summarize generic anti-drug antibody assays that do not require drug-specific reagents for nonclinical studies. These generic assays significantly reduce assay development efforts and, therefore, shorten the assay readiness timeline.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shankar G., Pendley C., Stein K. E. A risk-based bioanalytical strategy for the assessment of antibody immune responses against biological drugs. Nature Biotechnology. 2007;25(5):555–561. doi: 10.1038/nbt1303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mire-Sluis A. R., Barrett Y. C., Devanarayan V., et al. Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2004;289(1-2):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2004.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myler H., Felix T., Zhu J., Hruska M., Piccoli S. P. Measuring biotherapeutics with endogenous counterparts and pre-existing antibodies: an interferon case study. Bioanalysis. 2014;6(8):1113–1122. doi: 10.4155/bio.14.37. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Schie K. A., Wolbink G.-J., Rispens T. Cross-reactive and pre-existing antibodies to therapeutic antibodies—effects on treatment and immunogenicity. mAbs. 2015;7(4):662–671. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1048411. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gorovits B., McNally J., Fiorotti C., Leung S. Protein-based matrix interferences in ligand-binding assays. Bioanalysis. 2014;6(8):1131–1140. doi: 10.4155/bio.14.56. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms