Allometric scaling of brain regions to intra-cranial volume: An epidemiological MRI study
- PMID: 27557999
- PMCID: PMC5148715
- DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23351
Allometric scaling of brain regions to intra-cranial volume: An epidemiological MRI study
Abstract
There is growing evidence that sub-structures of the brain scale allometrically to total brain size, that is, in a non-proportional and non-linear way. Here, scaling of different volumes of interest (VOI) to intra-cranial volume (ICV) was examined. It was assessed whether scaling was allometric or isometric and whether scaling coefficients significantly differed from each other. We also tested to what extent allometric scaling of VOI was introduced by the automated segmentation technique. Furthermore, reproducibility of allometric scaling was studied different age groups and study populations. Study samples included samples of cognitively healthy adults from the community-based Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study (AGES-Reykjavik Study) (N = 3,883), the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA) (N =709), and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (N = 180). Data encompassed participants with different age, ethnicity, risk factor profile, and ICV and VOI obtained with different automated MRI segmentation techniques. Our analysis showed that (1) allometric scaling is a trait of all parts of the brain, (2) scaling of neo-cortical white matter, neo-cortical gray matter, and deep gray matter structures including the cerebellum are significantly different from each other, and (3) allometric scaling of brain structures cannot solely be explained by age-associated atrophy, sex, ethnicity, or a systematic bias from study-specific segmentation algorithm, but appears to be a true feature of brain geometry. Hum Brain Mapp 38:151-164, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: ADNI; AGES-Reykjavik; CARDIA; MRI; allometry; brain; cortex; intra-cranial volume; striatum; thalamus; white matter.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, Henley SM, Lehmann M, Hobbs N, Clarkson MJ, MacManus DG, Ourselin S, Fox NC (2010): Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: A necessary nuisance? Neuroimage 53:1244–1255. - PubMed
-
- Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999): Cortical surface‐based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179–194. - PubMed
-
- C Davatzikos, X Tao, D Shen (2003): Hierarchical active shape models, using the wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:414–423. - PubMed
-
- Deacon T (1990): Fallacies of progression in theories of brain‐size evolution. Int J Primatol 11:193–236.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
