Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Sep;30(6):630-8.
doi: 10.1037/adb0000204. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

Within-person associations between daily motivation and self-efficacy and drinking among problem drinkers in treatment

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Within-person associations between daily motivation and self-efficacy and drinking among problem drinkers in treatment

Jon Morgenstern et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Gaining a better understanding of the change process holds promise to improve alcohol treatment. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) coupled with intensive longitudinal data (ILD) approaches have been proposed as promising methods that can advance change process research but have been used infrequently in alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment research. The current study used these approaches to examine the within-person associations of motivation and self-efficacy and drinking among treatment-seeking problem drinkers. Participants (N = 96) received daily EMA surveys before, during, and after treatment for 7 weeks spread over a 9-month period. Multilevel modeling was used to test the within-person relationships between the change processes and drinking, controlling for between-person associations and prior drinking. Results indicated that daily fluctuations in motivation and self-efficacy significantly predicted drinking over the next 24 hours; however, several theory-driven hypotheses regarding factors that might moderate that relationship were not supported. Overall, results support the advantages of EMA and ILD as methods that can advance AUD treatment research. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amrhein PC, Miller WR, Yahne CE, Palmer M, & Fulcher L (2003). Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 862–878. - PubMed
    1. Annis HM, & Graham JM (1988). A Situational Confidence Questionnaire (SCQ 39) users guide. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
    1. Babor T, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, & Monteiro MG (2001). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Guidelines for use in primary care (2nd ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, World Health Organization.
    1. Babor T, Steinberg K, Anton R, & Del Boca FK (2000). Talk is cheap: Measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 55–63. - PubMed
    1. Bandura A (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

Publication types