Pro and con: Internal speech and the evolution of complex language
- PMID: 27562186
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15000709
Pro and con: Internal speech and the evolution of complex language
Abstract
The target article by Christiansen & Chater (C&C) offers an integrated framework for the study of language acquisition and, possibly, a novel role for internal speech in language acquisition. However, the "Now-or-Never bottleneck" raises a paradox for language evolution. It seems to imply that language complexity has been either reduced over time or has remained the same. How, then, could languages as complex as ours have evolved in prelinguistic ancestors? Linguistic Platonism could offer a solution to this paradox.
Comment in
-
Squeezing through the Now-or-Never bottleneck: Reconnecting language processing, acquisition, change, and structure.Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e91. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15001235. Behav Brain Sci. 2016. PMID: 27561252
Comment on
-
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e62. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Behav Brain Sci. 2016. PMID: 25869618
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
