Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591.
doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results

Affiliations

Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results

Christopher R Long et al. Clin Trials. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Participants in health research studies typically express interest in receiving the results from the studies in which they participate. However, participants' preferences and experiences related to receiving the results are not well understood. In general, the existing studies have had relatively small sample sizes and typically address specific and often sensitive issues within targeted populations.

Methods: This study used an online survey to explore attitudes and experiences of registrants in ResearchMatch, a large database of past, present, and potential health research participants. Survey respondents provided information related to whether or not they received research results from studies in which they participated, the methods used to communicate the results, their satisfaction with the results, and when and how they would like to receive research results from future studies. In all, 70,699 ResearchMatch registrants were notified of the study's topic. Of the 5207 registrants who requested full information about the study, 3381 respondents completed the survey.

Results: Approximately 33% of respondents with previous health research participation reported receiving the results. Approximately half of respondents with previous research participation reported no opportunity to request the results. However, almost all respondents said researchers should always or sometimes offer the results to participants. Respondents expressed particular interest in the results related to their (or a loved one's) health, as well as information about studies' purposes and any medical advances based on the results. In general, respondents' most preferred dissemination methods for the results were email and website postings. The least desirable dissemination methods for the results included Twitter, conference calls, and text messages. Across all the results, we compare the responses of respondents with and without previous research participation experience and those who have worked in research organizations versus those who have not. Compared to respondents who have previous participation experience, a greater proportion of respondents with no participation experience indicated that the results should always be shared with participants. Likewise, respondents with no participation experience placed higher importance on the receipt of each type of results' information included in the survey.

Conclusion: We present findings from a survey assessing attitudes and experiences of a broad sample of respondents that addresses gaps in knowledge related to participants' preferences for receiving the results. The study's findings highlight the potential for inconsistency between respondents' expressed preferences to receive specific types of results via specific methods and researchers' unwillingness or inability to provide them. We present specific recommendations to shift the approach of new studies to investigate participants' preferences for receiving research results.

Keywords: ResearchMatch; Results’ dissemination; disseminating results; dissemination; dissemination survey; participant preferences; participant registry; research results; results’ communication; social media dissemination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Partridge AH, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA. 2002;288(3):363–365. - PubMed
    1. Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(4):372–378. - PubMed
    1. Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Shurin S, Weijer C. Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25(9):704–708. - PubMed
    1. Partridge AH, Hackett N, Blood E, et al. Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(8):629–632. - PubMed
    1. Rigby H, Fernandez CV. Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting. Blood. 2005;106(4):1199–1202. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources