Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;7(4):644-64.
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.05.06.

Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review

Vivek Verma et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is frequently shown to be dosimetrically superior to photon radiotherapy (RT), though supporting data for clinical benefit are severely limited. Because of the potential for toxicity reduction in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, we systematically reviewed the literature on clinical outcomes (survival/toxicity) of PBT.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group, and American Society of Clinical Oncology was conducted for publications from 2000-2015. Thirty-eight original investigations were analyzed.

Results: Although results of PBT are not directly comparable to historical data, outcomes roughly mirror previous data, generally with reduced toxicities for PBT in some neoplasms. For esophageal cancer, PBT is associated with reduced toxicities, postoperative complications, and hospital stay as compared to photon radiation, while achieving comparable local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). In pancreatic cancer, numerical survival for resected/unresected cases is also similar to existing photon data, whereas grade ≥3 nausea/emesis and post-operative complications are numerically lower than those reported with photon RT. The strongest data in support of PBT for HCC comes from phase II trials demonstrating very low toxicities, and a phase III trial of PBT versus transarterial chemoembolization demonstrating trends towards improved LC and progression-free survival (PFS) with PBT, along with fewer post-treatment hospitalizations. Survival and toxicity data for cholangiocarcinoma, liver metastases, and retroperitoneal sarcoma are also roughly equivalent to historical photon controls. There are two small reports for gastric cancer and three for anorectal cancer; these are not addressed further.

Conclusions: Limited quality (and quantity) of data hamper direct comparisons and conclusions. However, the available data, despite the inherent caveats and limitations, suggest that PBT offers the potential to achieve significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities without compromising survival or LC for multiple GI malignancies. Several randomized comparative trials are underway that will provide more definitive answers.

Keywords: Proton radiation therapy (PBT); anal cancer; cholangiocarcinoma; esophageal cancer; gastric cancer; liver cancer; metastases; pancreatic cancer; particle therapy; rectal cancer; retroperitoneal sarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: MP Mehta has served as a consultant for Abbott, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Celldex, Cavion, Elekta, Novartis, Novocure, and Roche, has research funding from Novocure and Cellectar, and has served in a leadership capacity on the Pharmacyclics BOD (with stock options). SH Lin has research funding from Elekta, STCube Pharmaceuticals, Peregrine, Bayer, and Roche/Genentech, has served as consultant for AstraZeneca, and received honorarium from US Oncology and ProCure. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA diagram illustrating systematic searches used for this review. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Verma V, Mehta MP. Clinical Outcomes of Proton Radiotherapy for Uveal Melanoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016;28:e17-e27. 10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.034 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verma V, Shah C, Mehta MP. Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity of Proton Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2016;16:145-54. 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plastaras JP, Dionisi F, Wo JY. Gastrointestinal cancer: nonliver proton therapy for gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer J 2014;20:378-86. 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ask A, Johansson B, Glimelius B. The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer. Acta Oncol 2005;44:896-903. 10.1080/02841860500355926 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-41. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources