Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 27564273
- PMCID: PMC5006758
- DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0696
Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Introduction: To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) for the treatment of the large proximal ureteral stone.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was performed in June 2015 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis criteria.
Results: Six RCT including 646 patients were analyzed, 325 URS cases (50.3%) and 321 LU cases (49.7%). URS provided a significantly shorter operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -31.26 min; 95%CI -46.88 to -15.64; <0.0001) and length of hospital stay (WMD = -1.48 days; 95%CI -2.78 to -0.18; p=0.03) than LU. There were no significant differences in terms of overall complications (OR = 0.78; 95%CI 0.21-2.92; p=0.71) and major complications - Clavien ≥3 - (OR = 1.79; 95%CI 0.59-5.42; p=0.30). LU led to a significantly higher initial stone-free rate (OR = 8.65; 95%CI 4.18-17.91; p<0.00001) and final stone-free rate (OR = 6.41; 95%CI 2.24-18.32; p=0.0005) than URS. There was a significantly higher need for auxiliary procedures in URS cases (OR = 6.58; 95%CI 3.42-12.68; p<0.00001).
Conclusions: Outcomes with LU for larger proximal ureteral calculi are favorable compared to semi-rigid URS and should be considered as a first-line alternative if flexible ureteroscopy is not available. Utilization of flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with semi-rigid ureteroscopy may impact these outcomes, and deserves further systematic evaluation.
Keywords: Laparoscopy; Lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy.
Copyright© by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Urol Int. 2017;99(3):308-319. doi: 10.1159/000471773. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Urol Int. 2017. PMID: 28586770
-
Bilateral Same-Session Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1169-1179. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0472. Epub 2016 Oct 28. J Endourol. 2016. PMID: 27626367
-
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28456350
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22592707 Free PMC article.
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4. PMID: 22161396 Updated.
Cited by
-
Management of an Intraparenchymal Struvite Stone Using Laparoscopic Nephrolithotomy: A Case Report.Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jan 6;13(1):e70065. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70065. eCollection 2025 Jan. Clin Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 39776779 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy vs Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Ureteral Stones.JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2):e2019.00008. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00008. JSLS. 2019. PMID: 31223226 Free PMC article.
-
The usefulness of flexible cystoscopy for preventing double-J stent malposition after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0232-4. BMC Urol. 2017. PMID: 28619091 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34083725 Free PMC article.
-
Propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large impacted proximal ureteral stones with long-term follow-up.Urolithiasis. 2024 Jul 29;52(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01609-9. Urolithiasis. 2024. PMID: 39073726
References
-
- Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS., Jr Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol. 2001;166:538–540. - PubMed
-
- Eisner BH, Goldfarb DS, Pareek G. Pharmacologic treatment of kidney stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2013;40:21–30. - PubMed
-
- Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001;40:362–371. - PubMed
-
- Campschroer T, Zhu Y, Duijvesz D, Grobbee DE, Lock MT. Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4 CD008509. - PubMed
-
- Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2005;174:167–172. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous