Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0160906.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160906. eCollection 2016.

Promoting Activity in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Accelerometry

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Promoting Activity in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Accelerometry

Nancye M Peel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Low activity levels in inpatient rehabilitation are associated with adverse outcomes. The study aimed to test whether activity levels can be increased by the provision of monitored activity data to patients and clinicians in the context of explicit goal setting.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial in three sites in Australia included 255 inpatients aged 60 and older who had a rehabilitation goal to become ambulant. The primary outcome was patients' walking time measured by accelerometers during the rehabilitation admission. Walking times from accelerometry were made available daily to treating therapists and intervention participants to motivate patients to improve incidental activity levels and reach set goals. For the control group, 'usual care' was followed, including the setting of mobility goals; however, for this group, neither staff nor patients received data on walking times to aid the setting of daily walking time targets.

Results: The median daily walking time in the intervention group increased from 10.3 minutes at baseline to 32.1 minutes at day 28, compared with an increase from 9.5 to 26.5 minutes per day in the control group. Subjects in the intervention group had significantly higher non-therapy walking time by about 7 minutes [mean (95% CI): 24.6 (21.7, 27.4)] compared to those in the control group [mean(95% CI): 17.3 (14.4, 20.3)] (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Daily feedback to patients and therapists using an accelerometer increased walking times during rehabilitation admissions. The results of this study suggest objective monitoring of activity levels could provide clinicians with information on clinically important, mobility-related activities to assist goal setting.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000034932 http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Recruitment Flow Diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Average daily measures of non-therapy walking time by treatment groups.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Average daily measures of in-therapy walking time by treatment groups.
The measurements are based on GEE regression models, as described in the method section.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK. Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(8):1263–1270. - PubMed
    1. Patterson F, Blair V, Currie A, Reid W. An investigation into activity levels of older people on a rehabilitation ward: an observational study. Physiotherapy. 2005;91(1):28–34.
    1. Peel NM, Kuys SS. Walking activity of older patients in rehabilitation: a prospective study. J Frailty Aging. 2013;2(1):22–26. 10.14283/jfa.2013.4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith P, Galea M, Woodward M, Said C, Dorevitch M. Physical activity by elderly patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation is low: an observational study. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54(3):209–213. - PubMed
    1. Buttery AK, Martin FC. Knowledge, attitudes and intentions about participation in physical activity of older post-acute hospital inpatients. Physiotherapy. 2009;95(3):192–198. 10.1016/j.physio.2009.03.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types