A comparative review towards potential of microbial cells for heavy metal removal with emphasis on biosorption and bioaccumulation
- PMID: 27565780
- DOI: 10.1007/s11274-016-2117-1
A comparative review towards potential of microbial cells for heavy metal removal with emphasis on biosorption and bioaccumulation
Abstract
The threat of heavy metal pollution to environmental health is getting worldwide attention due to their persistence and non-biodegradable nature. Ineffectiveness of various physicochemical methods due to economical and technical constraints resulted in the search for a cost-effective and eco-friendly biological technique for heavy metal removal from the environment. The two effective biotic methods used are biosorption and bioaccumulation. A comparison between these two processes demonstrated that biosorption is a better heavy metal removal process than bioaccumulation. This is due to the intoxication of heavy metal by inhibiting their entry into the microbial cell. Genes and enzymes related to bioremoval process are also discussed. On comparing the removal rate, bacteria are surpassed by algae and fungi. The aim of this review is to understand the biotic processes and to compare their metal removal efficiency.
Keywords: Bioaccumulation; Biosorption; Dead/inactive cells; Heavy metals; Living cells; Physicochemical methods.
Similar articles
-
Bioremoval of heavy metals by bacterial biomass.Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Jan;187(1):4173. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4173-z. Epub 2014 Dec 4. Environ Monit Assess. 2015. PMID: 25471624
-
Microbes in Heavy Metal Remediation: A Review on Current Trends and Patents.Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2017;11(3):188-196. doi: 10.2174/1872208311666170120121025. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2017. PMID: 28116999 Review.
-
Cell surface engineering of microorganisms towards adsorption of heavy metals.Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015 Jun;41(2):140-9. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2013.813898. Epub 2013 Aug 5. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 23915280 Review.
-
Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review.Biotechnol Adv. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):427-51. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Jun 5. Biotechnol Adv. 2006. PMID: 16737792 Review.
-
A New Strategy for Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review of Microbial Biosorbents.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 19;14(1):94. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010094. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28106848 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Leveraging the One Health concept for arsenic sustainability.Eco Environ Health. 2024 Mar 7;3(3):392-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2024.02.006. eCollection 2024 Sep. Eco Environ Health. 2024. PMID: 39281074 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Heavy Metal Removal by Bioaccumulation Using Genetically Engineered Microorganisms.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 29;6:157. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00157. eCollection 2018. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 30420950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adhesion abilities and biosorption of Cd and Mg by microorganisms - first step for eco-friendly beneficiation of phosphate ore.Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):12929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49406-4. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31506570 Free PMC article.
-
Do environmentally induced DNA variations mediate adaptation in Aspergillus flavus exposed to chromium stress in tannery sludge?BMC Genomics. 2018 Dec 4;19(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5244-2. BMC Genomics. 2018. PMID: 30509176 Free PMC article.
-
Plant Microbiomes Alleviate Abiotic Stress-Associated Damage in Crops and Enhance Climate-Resilient Agriculture.Plants (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;14(12):1890. doi: 10.3390/plants14121890. Plants (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40573878 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources