Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden
- PMID: 27566732
- PMCID: PMC5753596
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1397-0
Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new comprehensive patient-reported measure of treatment burden-the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS).
Methods: A conceptual framework was used to derive the PETS with items reviewed and cognitively tested with patients. A survey battery, including a pilot version of the PETS, was mailed to 838 multi-morbid patients from two healthcare institutions for validation.
Results: A total of 332 multi-morbid patients returned completed surveys. Diagnostics supported deletion and consolidation of some items and domains. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a domain model for scaling comprised of 9 factors: medical information, medications, medical appointments, monitoring health, interpersonal challenges, medical/healthcare expenses, difficulty with healthcare services, role/social activity limitations, and physical/mental exhaustion. Scales showed good internal consistency (α range 0.79-0.95). Higher PETS scores, indicative of greater treatment burden, were correlated with more distress, less satisfaction with medications, lower self-efficacy, worse physical and mental health, and lower convenience of healthcare (Ps < 0.001). Patients with lower health literacy, less adherence to medications, and more financial difficulties reported higher PETS scores (Ps < 0.01).
Conclusion: A comprehensive patient-reported measure of treatment burden can help to better characterize the impact of treatment and self-management burden on patient well-being and guide care toward minimally disruptive medicine.
Keywords: Adherence; Multi-morbidity; Questionnaire; Self-management; Treatment burden; Validation.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Eton DT, Elraiyah TA, Yost KJ, Ridgeway JL, Johnson A, Egginton JS, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported measures of burden of treatment in three chronic diseases. Patient Related Outcome Measures. 2013;4:7–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S44694. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eton DT, Ramalho de Oliveira D, Egginton JS, Ridgeway JL, Odell L, May CR, et al. Building a measurement framework of burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions: a qualitative study. Patient Related Outcome Measures. 2012;3:39–49. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S34681. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eton DT, Ridgeway JL, Egginton JS, Tiedje K, Linzer M, Boehm DH, et al. Finalizing a measurement framework for the burden of treatment in complex patients with chronic conditions. Patient Related Outcome Measures. 2015;6:117–126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S78955. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sav A, Kendall E, McMillan SS, Kelly F, Whitty JA, King MA, et al. ‘You say treatment, I say hard work’: treatment burden among people with chronic illness and their carers in Australia. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2013;21(6):665–674. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12052. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sav A, King MA, Whitty JA, Kendall E, McMillan SS, Kelly F, et al. Burden of treatment for chronic illness: a concept analysis and review of the literature. Health Expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. 2013 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
